Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co (HPE) - Total Liabilities
Based on the latest financial reports, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co (HPE) has total liabilities worth $51.22 Billion USD as of October 2025. Total liabilities represent everything the company owes to external parties, combining both current liabilities—like accounts payable, short-term debt, and accrued expenses—and non-current liabilities such as long-term debt, pension obligations, lease liabilities, and deferred tax liabilities. Explore HPE cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co - Total Liabilities Trend (2013–2025)
This chart illustrates how Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co's total liabilities have evolved over time, based on quarterly financial data. Check HPE financial resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co Competitors by Total Liabilities
The table below lists competitors of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co ranked by their total liabilities.
| Company | Country | Total Liabilities |
|---|---|---|
|
PTT Public Company Limited
F:NVA3
|
Germany | €1.67 Trillion |
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd
F:RSK
|
Germany | €55.47 Billion |
|
Celltrion Inc
KO:068270
|
Korea | ₩4.98 Trillion |
|
China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd
SHG:601668
|
China | CN¥2.60 Trillion |
|
Roblox Corp
NYSE:RBLX
|
USA | $8.20 Billion |
|
Woolworths Group Ltd
AU:WOW
|
Australia | AU$28.87 Billion |
|
Sandoz Group AG
SW:SDZ
|
Switzerland | CHF12.79 Billion |
|
Bharat Electronics Limited
NSE:BEL_old
|
India | Rs231.82 Billion |
Liability Composition Analysis (2013–2025)
This chart breaks down Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co's total liabilities into key components over time: long-term debt, short-term debt, other current liabilities, and other non-current liabilities. Toggle between absolute values and percentage view to see how the composition has shifted. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co worth.
Liquidity & Leverage Metrics
Key Metrics Explained
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.01 | Measures ability to pay short-term obligations (Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities) |
| Quick Ratio | N/A | More stringent measure of short-term liquidity ((Current Assets - Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities) |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | Most conservative liquidity measure (Cash & Equivalents ÷ Current Liabilities) |
| Debt to Equity | 2.07 | Measures financial leverage (Total Liabilities ÷ Shareholder Equity) |
| Debt to Assets | 0.67 | Portion of assets financed with debt (Total Liabilities ÷ Total Assets) |
Liability Trends Comparison
This chart compares key liability metrics across different time periods, showing how Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co's debt structure has evolved. The comparison includes total liabilities, long-term debt, and current liabilities.
Annual Total Liabilities for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co (2013–2025)
The table below shows the annual total liabilities of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co from 2013 to 2025.
| Year | Total Liabilities | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-31 | $51.15 Billion | +10.28% |
| 2024-10-31 | $46.38 Billion | +29.14% |
| 2023-10-31 | $35.91 Billion | -3.49% |
| 2022-10-31 | $37.21 Billion | -1.24% |
| 2021-10-31 | $37.68 Billion | -0.63% |
| 2020-10-31 | $37.92 Billion | +9.42% |
| 2019-10-31 | $34.65 Billion | +1.27% |
| 2018-10-31 | $34.22 Billion | -9.71% |
| 2017-10-31 | $37.90 Billion | -21.30% |
| 2016-10-31 | $48.16 Billion | +1.71% |
| 2015-10-31 | $47.35 Billion | +69.73% |
| 2014-10-31 | $27.90 Billion | -8.23% |
| 2013-10-31 | $30.40 Billion | -- |
About Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, together with its subsidiaries, develops intelligent solutions in the United States, the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Japan, and internationally. It operates in five segments: Server, Hybrid Cloud, Networking, Financial Services, and Corporate Investments and Other. The company offers general-purpose servers, workload-optimized s… Read more