LiqTech International Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
LiqTech International Inc working capital to net assets ratio. LiqTech International Inc (LIQT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 82.8% as of June 2026. Working capital of $21.37 Million (current assets of $27.71 Million minus current liabilities of $6.34 Million) is measured against net assets of $25.80 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check LIQT tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of LiqTech International Inc (2008–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of LiqTech International Inc from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how LiqTech International Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 82.8%, reflecting working capital of $21.37 Million against net assets of $25.80 Million USD. See LIQT days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
LiqTech International Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2008–2025)
LiqTech International Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for LiqTech International Inc from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see LIQT current and non-current assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 108.3% | $11.24 Million | $10.37 Million | $15.96 Million | $4.72 Million | ▲ +13.9 pp |
| 2024 | 94.5% | $15.74 Million | $16.65 Million | $20.64 Million | $4.90 Million | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2023 | 84.5% | $14.59 Million | $17.28 Million | $22.09 Million | $7.50 Million | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2022 | 92.6% | $21.58 Million | $23.31 Million | $27.67 Million | $6.09 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2021 | 87.7% | $11.20 Million | $12.77 Million | $28.07 Million | $16.87 Million | ▲ +23.8 pp |
| 2020 | 63.8% | $15.84 Million | $24.82 Million | $25.65 Million | $9.81 Million | ▼ -10.7 pp |
| 2019 | 74.6% | $17.16 Million | $23.01 Million | $27.49 Million | $10.33 Million | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2018 | 79.1% | $6.75 Million | $8.54 Million | $11.37 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2017 | 67.4% | $4.66 Million | $6.91 Million | $9.43 Million | $4.77 Million | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2016 | 55.8% | $3.50 Million | $6.27 Million | $8.51 Million | $5.01 Million | ▲ +21.9 pp |
| 2015 | 33.9% | $7.64 Million | $22.57 Million | $12.98 Million | $5.34 Million | ▼ -5.3 pp |
| 2014 | 39.2% | $10.57 Million | $26.97 Million | $14.66 Million | $4.09 Million | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2013 | 50.8% | $7.69 Million | $15.13 Million | $12.24 Million | $4.55 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2012 | 55.4% | $8.07 Million | $14.55 Million | $11.83 Million | $3.76 Million | ▲ +27.6 pp |
| 2011 | 27.9% | $1.88 Million | $6.74 Million | $11.16 Million | $9.28 Million | ▼ -28.0 pp |
| 2010 | 55.8% | $-6.22K | $-11.15K | $5.42K | $11.65K | ▼ -47.5 pp |
| 2009 | 103.3% | $-7.00K | $-6.78K | $5.60K | $12.60K | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2008 | 85.7% | $2.21K | $2.58K | $9.44K | $7.22K | — |