Portman Ridge Finance Corp (PTMN) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance Corp (PTMN) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 2.8% as of September 2025. Working capital of $6.36 Million (current assets of $8.73 Million minus current liabilities of $2.37 Million) is measured against net assets of $231.30 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See debt-free asset ratio of Portman Ridge Finance Corp to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Portman Ridge Finance Corp Working Capital to Net Assets (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Portman Ridge Finance Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 2.8%, reflecting working capital of $6.36 Million against net assets of $231.30 Million USD. Check Portman Ridge Finance Corp (PTMN) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Portman Ridge Finance Corp (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Portman Ridge Finance Corp from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see how much is Portman Ridge Finance Corp worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10.3% | $18.33 Million | $178.49 Million | $24.99 Million | $6.65 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2023 | 9.8% | $20.87 Million | $213.52 Million | $34.18 Million | $13.31 Million | ▼ -201.5 pp |
| 2022 | 211.3% | $490.45 Million | $232.12 Million | $495.07 Million | $4.61 Million | ▲ +196.0 pp |
| 2021 | 15.3% | $42.90 Million | $280.12 Million | $55.13 Million | $12.24 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 15.1% | $32.55 Million | $216.26 Million | $35.43 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2019 | 16.3% | $24.87 Million | $152.20 Million | $26.40 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +28.5 pp |
| 2018 | -12.1% | $-19.16 Million | $158.02 Million | $7.77 Million | $26.93 Million | ▼ -44215428.0 pp |
| 2017 | 44215415.9% | $80.39 Trillion | $181.80 Million | $80.39 Trillion | $36.57 Million | ▲ +43014357.0 pp |
| 2016 | 1201058.9% | $2.34 Trillion | $194.92 Million | $2.34 Trillion | $10.86 Million | ▲ +9292839.5 pp |
| 2015 | -8091780.6% | $-17.49 Trillion | $216.10 Million | $1.81 Trillion | $19.30 Trillion | ▼ -13353701.9 pp |
| 2014 | 5261921.3% | $13.43 Trillion | $255.32 Million | $13.43 Trillion | $31.21 Million | ▲ +5261922.7 pp |
| 2013 | -1.4% | $-3.54 Million | $250.37 Million | $12.67 Million | $16.21 Million | ▼ -7803290.2 pp |
| 2012 | 7803288.8% | $16.22 Trillion | $207.88 Million | $16.22 Trillion | $9.98 Million | ▲ +7803288.4 pp |
| 2011 | 0.4% | $734.25K | $180.53 Million | $8.34 Million | $7.61 Million | ▼ -43.7 pp |
| 2010 | 44.1% | $82.49 Million | $186.93 Million | $88.64 Million | $6.15 Million | ▲ +33.4 pp |
| 2009 | 10.7% | $22.84 Million | $213.90 Million | $30.31 Million | $7.47 Million | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2008 | -1.6% | $-3.97 Million | $250.28 Million | $6.93 Million | $10.90 Million | ▼ -6824807.3 pp |
| 2007 | 6824805.8% | $17.68 Trillion | $259.07 Million | $17.68 Trillion | $267.05 Million | — |