Sigma Lithium Resources Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Sigma Lithium Resources Corp working capital to net assets ratio. Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -78.2% as of September 2025. Working capital of $-65.52 Million (current assets of $62.80 Million minus current liabilities of $128.32 Million) is measured against net assets of $83.77 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible net worth ratio of Sigma Lithium Resources Corp to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (2011–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Sigma Lithium Resources Corp from 2011 to 2024. This chart shows how Sigma Lithium Resources Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 14 annual periods from 2011 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at -78.2%, reflecting working capital of $-65.52 Million against net assets of $83.77 Million USD. See SGML defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Sigma Lithium Resources Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2011–2024)
Sigma Lithium Resources Corp working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2011 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp from 2011 to 2024, covering 14 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Sigma Lithium Resources Corp asset portfolio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -17.3% | $-23.02 Million | $132.83 Million | $133.45 Million | $156.47 Million | ▼ -26.8 pp |
| 2023 | 9.5% | $20.30 Million | $214.28 Million | $142.68 Million | $122.37 Million | ▼ -32.6 pp |
| 2022 | 42.1% | $77.05 Million | $183.11 Million | $114.49 Million | $37.44 Million | ▼ -39.3 pp |
| 2021 | 81.4% | $118.01 Million | $145.02 Million | $121.66 Million | $3.64 Million | ▲ +48.7 pp |
| 2020 | 32.7% | $7.12 Million | $21.76 Million | $14.05 Million | $6.93 Million | ▲ +88.6 pp |
| 2019 | -55.9% | $-4.89 Million | $8.74 Million | $483.87K | $5.37 Million | ▼ -48.3 pp |
| 2018 | -7.6% | $-866.87K | $11.38 Million | $4.52 Million | $5.38 Million | ▼ -101.3 pp |
| 2017 | 93.7% | $-14.20 Million | $-15.15 Million | $338.00K | $14.54 Million | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $-5.88K | $-5.88K | $15.67K | $21.55K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $43.77K | $43.77K | $61.27K | $17.51K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $194.34K | $194.34K | $202.15K | $7.81K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $46.34K | $46.34K | $64.33K | $18.00K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2012 | 99.5% | $106.59K | $107.16K | $122.81K | $16.23K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $32.45K | $32.45K | $57.51K | $25.07K | — |