Zivo Bioscience Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Zivo Bioscience Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Zivo Bioscience Inc (ZIVO) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 101.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of $-3.49 Million (current assets of $270.75K minus current liabilities of $3.76 Million) is measured against net assets of $-3.42 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Zivo Bioscience Inc (ZIVO) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Zivo Bioscience Inc (2003–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Zivo Bioscience Inc from 2003 to 2025. This chart shows how Zivo Bioscience Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2003 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 101.8%, reflecting working capital of $-3.49 Million against net assets of $-3.42 Million USD. See Zivo Bioscience Inc (ZIVO) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Zivo Bioscience Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2003–2025)
Zivo Bioscience Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2003 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Zivo Bioscience Inc from 2003 to 2025, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see total assets of Zivo Bioscience Inc.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 101.6% | $-3.81 Million | $-3.75 Million | $401.34K | $4.21 Million | ▲ +22.7 pp |
| 2024 | 78.9% | $-406.38K | $-514.90K | $1.64 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -27.0 pp |
| 2023 | 105.9% | $-2.34 Million | $-2.21 Million | $425.38K | $2.76 Million | ▼ -1080.7 pp |
| 2022 | 1186.6% | $-126.04K | $-10.62K | $1.90 Million | $2.03 Million | ▲ +1087.1 pp |
| 2021 | 99.5% | $6.01 Million | $6.04 Million | $8.96 Million | $2.95 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2020 | 99.3% | $-11.23 Million | $-11.31 Million | $167.81K | $11.39 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $-8.34 Million | $-8.34 Million | $369.39K | $8.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $-22.28 Million | $-22.28 Million | $411.51K | $22.69 Million | ▲ +74.1 pp |
| 2017 | 25.9% | $-4.23 Million | $-16.30 Million | $332.28K | $4.56 Million | ▼ -52.3 pp |
| 2016 | 78.3% | $-10.66 Million | $-13.62 Million | $520.42K | $11.18 Million | ▲ +26.2 pp |
| 2015 | 52.0% | $-4.94 Million | $-9.50 Million | $28.93K | $4.97 Million | ▼ -45.3 pp |
| 2014 | 97.4% | $-6.20 Million | $-6.37 Million | $33.11K | $6.23 Million | ▼ -8.8 pp |
| 2013 | 106.2% | $-10.19 Million | $-9.59 Million | $688.53K | $10.88 Million | ▲ +23.5 pp |
| 2012 | 82.7% | $-3.27 Million | $-3.96 Million | $90.81K | $3.36 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2011 | 75.7% | $-1.54 Million | $-2.03 Million | $249.83K | $1.79 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2010 | 78.1% | $-743.53K | $-951.68K | $37.01K | $780.54K | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2009 | 97.2% | $-3.68 Million | $-3.79 Million | $94.80K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -13.9 pp |
| 2008 | 111.1% | $-577.32K | $-519.60K | $107.83K | $685.14K | ▲ +25.7 pp |
| 2007 | 85.4% | $-645.05K | $-755.37K | $33.75K | $678.80K | ▼ -39.0 pp |
| 2006 | 124.4% | $-1.04 Million | $-832.54K | $56.03K | $1.09 Million | ▲ +17.9 pp |
| 2005 | 106.5% | $-628.65K | $-590.09K | $621.37K | $1.25 Million | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2004 | 102.1% | $-1.13 Million | $-1.10 Million | $30.30K | $1.16 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $-35.94K | $-35.94K | $9.85K | $45.78K | — |