Zeta Network Group Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Zeta Network Group working capital to net assets ratio. Zeta Network Group (ZNB) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 94.4% as of December 2025. Working capital of $169.54 Million (current assets of $177.95 Million minus current liabilities of $8.41 Million) is measured against net assets of $179.63 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check ZNB goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Zeta Network Group (2008–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Zeta Network Group from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how Zeta Network Group's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 94.4%, reflecting working capital of $169.54 Million against net assets of $179.63 Million USD. See operational self-sufficiency of Zeta Network Group to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Zeta Network Group Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2008–2025)
Zeta Network Group working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Zeta Network Group from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Zeta Network Group total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -37.6% | $-8.77 Million | $23.32 Million | $3.73 Million | $12.50 Million | ▼ -45.2 pp |
| 2024 | 7.6% | $1.42 Million | $18.53 Million | $10.47 Million | $9.06 Million | ▼ -35.7 pp |
| 2023 | 43.4% | $10.72 Million | $24.72 Million | $16.05 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2022 | 47.2% | $22.85 Million | $48.44 Million | $27.87 Million | $5.02 Million | ▲ +42.6 pp |
| 2021 | 4.6% | $3.52 Million | $76.95 Million | $7.64 Million | $4.12 Million | ▼ -35.4 pp |
| 2020 | 39.9% | $2.63 Million | $6.59 Million | $3.16 Million | $528.83K | ▲ +258.6 pp |
| 2019 | -218.6% | $-1.14 Million | $520.80K | $52.51 Million | $53.64 Million | ▼ -290.3 pp |
| 2018 | 71.7% | $6.95 Million | $9.70 Million | $50.65 Million | $43.70 Million | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2017 | 63.1% | $6.23 Million | $9.88 Million | $76.73 Million | $70.50 Million | ▼ -14.6 pp |
| 2016 | 77.7% | $16.42 Million | $21.13 Million | $90.72 Million | $74.30 Million | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2015 | 68.9% | $27.36 Million | $39.70 Million | $115.83 Million | $88.46 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2014 | 64.0% | $25.85 Million | $40.40 Million | $136.90 Million | $111.05 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2013 | 66.9% | $37.95 Million | $56.69 Million | $123.47 Million | $85.52 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2012 | 65.9% | $52.05 Million | $79.00 Million | $137.25 Million | $85.21 Million | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2011 | 56.8% | $47.22 Million | $83.09 Million | $108.35 Million | $61.13 Million | ▲ +17.1 pp |
| 2010 | 39.8% | $24.33 Million | $61.18 Million | $45.83 Million | $21.51 Million | ▲ +25.7 pp |
| 2009 | 14.0% | $5.27 Million | $37.49 Million | $25.30 Million | $20.04 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2008 | 15.3% | $3.15 Million | $20.60 Million | $16.24 Million | $13.08 Million | — |