MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust working capital to net assets ratio. MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 2.5% as of May 2025. Working capital of $1.69 Million (current assets of $2.19 Million minus current liabilities of $494.30K) is measured against net assets of $67.39 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check how tangible is MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust's equity to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (2012–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust from 2012 to 2024. This chart shows how MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 13 annual periods from 2012 to 2024. As of May 2025, the ratio stands at 2.5%, reflecting working capital of $1.69 Million against net assets of $67.39 Million USD. See MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2012–2024)
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2012 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust from 2012 to 2024, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see how large is MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust's balance sheet.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.1% | $-824.41K | $73.57 Million | $31.46K | $855.87K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2023 | 0.1% | $50.28K | $68.80 Million | $1.68 Million | $1.63 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2022 | 1.3% | $977.68K | $76.69 Million | $1.78 Million | $798.01K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2021 | 2.8% | $2.72 Million | $98.77 Million | $7.91 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 2.8% | $2.73 Million | $98.01 Million | $4.03 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 2.8% | $2.74 Million | $97.83 Million | $3.02 Million | $275.07K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2018 | 3.4% | $3.17 Million | $92.36 Million | $4.01 Million | $835.57K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2017 | 2.1% | $2.16 Million | $103.12 Million | $3.47 Million | $1.31 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2016 | 2.5% | $2.96 Million | $117.64 Million | $3.19 Million | $234.21K | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2015 | 4.2% | $5.14 Million | $123.65 Million | $5.38 Million | $237.17K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 2.1% | $2.61 Million | $123.36 Million | $3.94 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2013 | 6.0% | $6.69 Million | $112.22 Million | $7.30 Million | $614.79K | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2012 | 0.7% | $871.99K | $127.80 Million | $3.58 Million | $2.71 Million | — |