Eason Technology Limited Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Eason Technology Limited working capital to net assets ratio. Eason Technology Limited (DXF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 34.8% as of March 2026. Working capital of $16.23 Million (current assets of $21.62 Million minus current liabilities of $5.40 Million) is measured against net assets of $46.68 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check DXF tangible net assets ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Eason Technology Limited (2008–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Eason Technology Limited from 2008 to 2025. This chart shows how Eason Technology Limited's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 34.8%, reflecting working capital of $16.23 Million against net assets of $46.68 Million USD. See defensive interval ratio of Eason Technology Limited to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Eason Technology Limited Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2008–2025)
Eason Technology Limited working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2008 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Eason Technology Limited from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see DXF total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34.8% | $16.23 Million | $46.68 Million | $21.62 Million | $5.40 Million | ▲ +99.8 pp |
| 2024 | -65.1% | $-18.25 Million | $28.05 Million | $24.56 Million | $42.81 Million | ▼ -374.8 pp |
| 2023 | 309.7% | $-158.44 Million | $-51.16 Million | $166.22 Million | $324.66 Million | ▲ +237.1 pp |
| 2022 | 72.6% | $209.24 Million | $288.16 Million | $443.49 Million | $234.25 Million | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2021 | 57.4% | $182.71 Million | $318.30 Million | $398.96 Million | $216.25 Million | ▲ +19.2 pp |
| 2020 | 38.2% | $170.32 Million | $446.30 Million | $378.01 Million | $207.69 Million | ▲ +20.5 pp |
| 2019 | 17.6% | $83.38 Million | $473.13 Million | $273.99 Million | $190.61 Million | ▲ +29.0 pp |
| 2018 | -11.4% | $-41.88 Million | $367.07 Million | $163.68 Million | $205.56 Million | ▼ -113.6 pp |
| 2017 | 102.2% | $603.07 Million | $590.30 Million | $868.15 Million | $265.08 Million | ▲ +14.9 pp |
| 2016 | 87.3% | $506.08 Million | $579.68 Million | $506.60 Million | $518.00K | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2015 | 97.1% | $710.45 Million | $731.76 Million | $913.43 Million | $202.98 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 97.1% | $1.29 Billion | $1.33 Billion | $1.54 Billion | $245.34 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2013 | 98.2% | $1.47 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $1.65 Billion | $173.26 Million | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2012 | 97.4% | $1.37 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $1.61 Billion | $245.34 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 97.8% | $1.21 Billion | $1.23 Billion | $1.46 Billion | $257.34 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 99.3% | $996.17 Million | $1.00 Billion | $1.09 Billion | $98.69 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2009 | 98.8% | $225.63 Million | $228.41 Million | $283.71 Million | $58.08 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2008 | 97.8% | $144.11 Million | $147.40 Million | $217.10 Million | $73.00 Million | — |