Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc working capital to net assets ratio. Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc (DIA) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 103.8% as of November 2025. Working capital of CA$-685.99K (current assets of CA$173.98K minus current liabilities of CA$859.97K) is measured against net assets of CA$-660.99K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc (DIA) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc (2012–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc from 2012 to 2024. This chart shows how Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 13 annual periods from 2012 to 2024. As of November 2025, the ratio stands at 103.8%, reflecting working capital of CA$-685.99K against net assets of CA$-660.99K CAD. See Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc (DIA) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2012–2024)
Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2012 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc from 2012 to 2024, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$-348.84K | CA$-348.84K | CA$155.88K | CA$504.72K | ▲ +136.9 pp |
| 2023 | -36.9% | CA$-318.90K | CA$865.31K | CA$239.78K | CA$558.68K | ▲ +2789.3 pp |
| 2022 | -2826.1% | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$40.29K | CA$64.85K | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -3057.1 pp |
| 2021 | 231.0% | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$-586.43K | CA$61.32K | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -59.7 pp |
| 2020 | 290.7% | CA$-975.88K | CA$-335.68K | CA$43.07K | CA$1.02 Million | ▲ +289.5 pp |
| 2019 | 1.3% | CA$10.35K | CA$825.02K | CA$89.03K | CA$78.69K | ▼ -10.4 pp |
| 2018 | 11.7% | CA$495.29K | CA$4.24 Million | CA$803.02K | CA$307.73K | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2017 | 1.3% | CA$42.50K | CA$3.29 Million | CA$359.43K | CA$316.92K | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2016 | -0.8% | CA$-20.41K | CA$2.49 Million | CA$144.73K | CA$165.14K | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2015 | -3.9% | CA$-95.41K | CA$2.48 Million | CA$283.31K | CA$378.72K | ▼ -57.9 pp |
| 2014 | 54.0% | CA$899.91K | CA$1.67 Million | CA$1.21 Million | CA$306.12K | ▼ -46.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$106.85K | CA$106.85K | CA$118.46K | CA$11.60K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$253.79K | CA$253.79K | CA$264.11K | CA$10.31K | — |