Kingsmen Resources Ltd Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Kingsmen Resources Ltd working capital to net assets ratio. Kingsmen Resources Ltd (KNG) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 80.8% as of June 2026. Working capital of CA$14.01 Million (current assets of CA$14.06 Million minus current liabilities of CA$50.53K) is measured against net assets of CA$17.34 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Kingsmen Resources Ltd (KNG) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Kingsmen Resources Ltd (2005–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Kingsmen Resources Ltd from 2005 to 2025. This chart shows how Kingsmen Resources Ltd's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 80.8%, reflecting working capital of CA$14.01 Million against net assets of CA$17.34 Million CAD. See operational self-sufficiency of Kingsmen Resources Ltd to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Kingsmen Resources Ltd Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
Kingsmen Resources Ltd working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Kingsmen Resources Ltd from 2005 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Kingsmen Resources Ltd assets under control.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 67.8% | CA$4.15 Million | CA$6.11 Million | CA$4.37 Million | CA$223.93K | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2024 | 73.6% | CA$1.25 Million | CA$1.70 Million | CA$1.33 Million | CA$80.11K | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2023 | 72.8% | CA$877.59K | CA$1.21 Million | CA$940.66K | CA$63.07K | ▼ -13.3 pp |
| 2022 | 86.1% | CA$766.45K | CA$890.37K | CA$816.70K | CA$50.24K | ▼ -13.9 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$901.09K | CA$901.09K | CA$908.83K | CA$7.74K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$804.09K | CA$804.09K | CA$817.97K | CA$13.88K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$715.70K | CA$715.70K | CA$724.62K | CA$8.92K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$564.51K | CA$564.51K | CA$586.72K | CA$22.21K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$243.34K | CA$243.34K | CA$252.19K | CA$8.85K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$366.65K | CA$366.65K | CA$385.80K | CA$19.16K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$557.04K | CA$557.04K | CA$578.25K | CA$21.20K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2014 | 98.8% | CA$769.21K | CA$778.31K | CA$784.32K | CA$15.11K | ▲ +69.6 pp |
| 2013 | 29.3% | CA$883.81K | CA$3.02 Million | CA$908.70K | CA$24.89K | ▼ -35.9 pp |
| 2007 | 65.1% | CA$2.04 Million | CA$3.14 Million | CA$2.29 Million | CA$245.61K | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2006 | 76.3% | CA$2.48 Million | CA$3.25 Million | CA$2.58 Million | CA$102.43K | ▼ -10.4 pp |
| 2005 | 86.7% | CA$904.55K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$944.67K | CA$40.13K | — |