RT Minerals Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
RT Minerals Corp working capital to net assets ratio. RT Minerals Corp (RTM) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 488.0% as of May 2026. Working capital of CA$-1.05 Million (current assets of CA$4.12K minus current liabilities of CA$1.06 Million) is measured against net assets of CA$-215.57K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check how tangible is RT Minerals Corp's equity to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of RT Minerals Corp (2013–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of RT Minerals Corp from 2013 to 2025. This chart shows how RT Minerals Corp's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 13 annual periods from 2013 to 2025. As of May 2026, the ratio stands at 488.0%, reflecting working capital of CA$-1.05 Million against net assets of CA$-215.57K CAD. See RT Minerals Corp (RTM) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
RT Minerals Corp Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2013–2025)
RT Minerals Corp working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2013 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for RT Minerals Corp from 2013 to 2025, covering 13 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see RTM asset base.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 639.8% | CA$-942.65K | CA$-147.34K | CA$67.78K | CA$1.01 Million | ▲ +7552.4 pp |
| 2024 | -6912.6% | CA$-50.53K | CA$731.00 | CA$323.99K | CA$374.52K | ▼ -6733.3 pp |
| 2023 | -179.3% | CA$-111.57K | CA$62.24K | CA$101.16K | CA$212.74K | ▼ -140.4 pp |
| 2022 | -38.9% | CA$-408.66K | CA$1.05 Million | CA$162.49K | CA$571.15K | ▼ -44.9 pp |
| 2021 | 6.0% | CA$153.07K | CA$2.55 Million | CA$467.77K | CA$314.69K | ▼ -16.0 pp |
| 2020 | 22.1% | CA$435.76K | CA$1.98 Million | CA$830.53K | CA$394.77K | ▲ +34.4 pp |
| 2019 | -12.4% | CA$-112.22K | CA$906.97K | CA$11.58K | CA$123.79K | ▼ -20.4 pp |
| 2018 | 8.0% | CA$96.31K | CA$1.20 Million | CA$138.97K | CA$42.67K | ▲ +13.5 pp |
| 2017 | -5.5% | CA$-76.72K | CA$1.39 Million | CA$101.06K | CA$177.78K | ▼ -35.7 pp |
| 2016 | 30.2% | CA$189.07K | CA$626.56K | CA$303.47K | CA$114.40K | ▲ +39.5 pp |
| 2015 | -9.3% | CA$-14.38K | CA$154.75K | CA$80.45K | CA$94.83K | ▼ -166.1 pp |
| 2014 | 156.8% | CA$-240.56K | CA$-153.37K | CA$4.87K | CA$245.43K | ▲ +41.3 pp |
| 2013 | 115.5% | CA$-373.94K | CA$-323.68K | CA$14.32K | CA$388.25K | — |