Daktronics Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Daktronics Inc capital reinvestment ratio. Daktronics Inc (DAKT) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.31x as of January 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($11.72 Million) in capital expenditures ($3.63 Million). Check Daktronics Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Daktronics Inc (1993–2025)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Daktronics Inc from 1993 to 2025. This chart tracks Daktronics Inc's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 29 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Daktronics Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Daktronics Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Daktronics Inc capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Daktronics Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $97.71 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $63.24 Million | $16.98 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 2023 | 1.69x | $15.02 Million | $25.39 Million | ▲ +1317.7% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $66.21 Million | $7.89 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 2020 | 1.67x | $10.81 Million | $18.09 Million | ▲ +186.4% |
| 2019 | 0.58x | $29.55 Million | $17.27 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $30.36 Million | $18.13 Million | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $39.57 Million | $8.69 Million | ▼ -82.9% |
| 2016 | 1.28x | $13.28 Million | $17.06 Million | ▲ +213.6% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $53.30 Million | $21.84 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $36.20 Million | $13.52 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | $50.75 Million | $9.67 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2012 | 0.82x | $20.09 Million | $16.52 Million | ▲ +262.4% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $41.35 Million | $9.39 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | $43.78 Million | $16.12 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $48.73 Million | $22.89 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2008 | 0.57x | $59.83 Million | $33.92 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2007 | 4.02x | $14.61 Million | $58.74 Million | ▲ +578.5% |
| 2006 | 0.59x | $31.92 Million | $18.92 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.60x | $22.38 Million | $13.48 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | $20.92 Million | $9.78 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | $15.91 Million | $5.34 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2002 | 0.46x | $17.23 Million | $7.94 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2001 | 1.00x | $7.37 Million | $7.35 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2000 | 2.11x | $3.29 Million | $6.93 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 1998 | 4.13x | $800.00K | $3.30 Million | ▲ +818.8% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | $4.90 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -80.0% |
| 1994 | 2.25x | $800.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +912.5% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $2.70 Million | $600.00K | — |