Daktronics Inc (DAKT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Daktronics Inc (DAKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($252.64 Million) in one year. See DAKT free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Daktronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Daktronics Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Daktronics Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Daktronics Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Daktronics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see DAKT market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | $97.71 Million | $230.96 Million | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $63.24 Million | $289.09 Million | ▲ +289.1% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $15.02 Million | $267.23 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-27.04 Million | $249.31 Million | ▼ -129.7% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $66.21 Million | $181.61 Million | ▲ +560.1% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $10.81 Million | $195.67 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $29.55 Million | $161.55 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $30.36 Million | $161.18 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $39.57 Million | $157.15 Million | ▲ +184.5% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $13.28 Million | $149.97 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $53.30 Million | $167.44 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $36.20 Million | $154.33 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | $50.75 Million | $131.17 Million | ▲ +141.1% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $20.09 Million | $125.16 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | $41.35 Million | $124.75 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $43.78 Million | $98.80 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $48.73 Million | $112.97 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2008 | 0.54x | $59.83 Million | $111.23 Million | ▲ +313.0% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $14.61 Million | $112.14 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $31.92 Million | $73.89 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2005 | 0.47x | $22.38 Million | $47.55 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $20.92 Million | $39.97 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | $15.91 Million | $37.11 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $17.23 Million | $35.76 Million | ▲ +189.9% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.37 Million | $44.31 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $3.29 Million | $36.18 Million | ▲ +601.7% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-600.00K | $33.10 Million | ▼ -141.5% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $800.00K | $18.30 Million | ▼ -86.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $4.90 Million | $15.30 Million | ▲ +284.9% |
| 1996 | -0.17x | $-3.10 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 1995 | -0.20x | $-1.60 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -302.4% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $800.00K | $8.30 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $2.70 Million | $13.30 Million | — |