Daktronics Inc (DAKT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Daktronics Inc (DAKT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($252.64 Million) in one year. Explore DAKT strategic capital deployment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Daktronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Daktronics Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Daktronics Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Daktronics Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Daktronics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Daktronics Inc (DAKT) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.42x | $97.71 Million | $230.96 Million | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $63.24 Million | $289.09 Million | ▲ +289.1% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $15.02 Million | $267.23 Million | ▲ +151.8% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-27.04 Million | $249.31 Million | ▼ -129.7% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $66.21 Million | $181.61 Million | ▲ +560.1% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $10.81 Million | $195.67 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $29.55 Million | $161.55 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $30.36 Million | $161.18 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $39.57 Million | $157.15 Million | ▲ +184.5% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $13.28 Million | $149.97 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $53.30 Million | $167.44 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $36.20 Million | $154.33 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2013 | 0.39x | $50.75 Million | $131.17 Million | ▲ +141.1% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $20.09 Million | $125.16 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | $41.35 Million | $124.75 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $43.78 Million | $98.80 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $48.73 Million | $112.97 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2008 | 0.54x | $59.83 Million | $111.23 Million | ▲ +313.0% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $14.61 Million | $112.14 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2006 | 0.43x | $31.92 Million | $73.89 Million | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2005 | 0.47x | $22.38 Million | $47.55 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $20.92 Million | $39.97 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2003 | 0.43x | $15.91 Million | $37.11 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $17.23 Million | $35.76 Million | ▲ +189.9% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $7.37 Million | $44.31 Million | ▲ +82.8% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $3.29 Million | $36.18 Million | ▲ +601.7% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-600.00K | $33.10 Million | ▼ -141.5% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $800.00K | $18.30 Million | ▼ -86.3% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $4.90 Million | $15.30 Million | ▲ +284.9% |
| 1996 | -0.17x | $-3.10 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 1995 | -0.20x | $-1.60 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -302.4% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $800.00K | $8.30 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $2.70 Million | $13.30 Million | — |