Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.30x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($7.31 Million) in capital expenditures ($2.17 Million). Check Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1992–2026)
This chart tracks Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (1992–2026)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock from 1992 to 2026. See Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.84x | $8.54 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2024 | 1.16x | $4.98 Million | $5.79 Million | ▲ +351.7% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | $63.89 Million | $16.45 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2021 | 0.55x | $8.43 Million | $4.61 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2020 | 0.44x | $11.23 Million | $4.94 Million | ▲ +423.8% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $9.63 Million | $807.99K | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $3.25 Million | $349.18K | ▼ -84.7% |
| 2016 | 0.70x | $3.03 Million | $2.12 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2014 | 0.66x | $2.89 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +1416.4% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $11.50 Million | $499.49K | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $8.45 Million | $321.40K | ▼ -58.4% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $4.10 Million | $374.29K | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $25.46 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -97.9% |
| 2008 | 3.73x | $1.19 Million | $4.44 Million | ▲ +267.4% |
| 2007 | 1.02x | $6.80 Million | $6.91 Million | ▲ +341.6% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $8.54 Million | $1.96 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $2.48 Million | $953.61K | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2004 | 0.27x | $3.03 Million | $821.21K | ▼ -93.1% |
| 2003 | 3.94x | $153.49K | $604.74K | ▲ +2768.7% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $9.07 Million | $1.25 Million | ▲ +67.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $4.86 Million | $399.26K | ▼ -76.7% |
| 1999 | 0.35x | $6.80 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -48.4% |
| 1998 | 0.68x | $3.80 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +1063.2% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | $1.70 Million | $100.00K | ▼ -71.8% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $2.40 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -79.2% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +175.0% |
| 1992 | 0.36x | $1.10 Million | $400.00K | — |