Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $434.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($172.02 Million) in one year. See FRD FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock across 34 annual periods. Also explore Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-4.41 Million | $94.40 Million | ▼ -196.2% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $4.98 Million | $102.54 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2023 | 0.76x | $63.89 Million | $83.88 Million | ▲ +552.5% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-13.40 Million | $79.59 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $8.43 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 1.04x | $11.23 Million | $10.85 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2019 | 0.68x | $9.63 Million | $14.12 Million | ▲ +137.7% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $3.25 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +511.6% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-202.66K | $2.91 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2016 | 0.83x | $3.03 Million | $3.65 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2015 | -1.70x | $-6.37 Million | $3.74 Million | ▼ -628.2% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $2.89 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2013 | 0.84x | $11.50 Million | $13.62 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | $8.45 Million | $15.15 Million | ▲ +186.1% |
| 2011 | -0.65x | $-6.99 Million | $10.78 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $4.10 Million | $8.67 Million | ▼ -91.9% |
| 2009 | 5.86x | $25.46 Million | $4.35 Million | ▲ +10733.8% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $1.19 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $6.80 Million | $23.76 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.54 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +182.7% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $2.48 Million | $15.44 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $3.03 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +1654.2% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $153.49K | $11.53 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $9.07 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +144.0% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $4.86 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +288.9% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.40 Million | $16.48 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $6.80 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $3.80 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.40 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +244.1% |
| 1995 | -0.13x | $-1.80 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | $-1.20 Million | $9.80 Million | ▼ -344.9% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $200.00K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 1992 | 0.33x | $1.10 Million | $3.30 Million | — |