Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($169.65 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock across 34 annual periods. Also explore Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Friedman Industries Inc. Common Stock (FRD) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.05x | $-4.41 Million | $94.40 Million | ▼ -196.2% |
| 2024 | 0.05x | $4.98 Million | $102.54 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 2023 | 0.76x | $63.89 Million | $83.88 Million | ▲ +552.5% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | $-13.40 Million | $79.59 Million | ▼ -159.3% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $8.43 Million | $29.67 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2020 | 1.04x | $11.23 Million | $10.85 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2019 | 0.68x | $9.63 Million | $14.12 Million | ▲ +137.7% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $3.25 Million | $11.31 Million | ▲ +511.6% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-202.66K | $2.91 Million | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2016 | 0.83x | $3.03 Million | $3.65 Million | ▲ +148.6% |
| 2015 | -1.70x | $-6.37 Million | $3.74 Million | ▼ -628.2% |
| 2014 | 0.32x | $2.89 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2013 | 0.84x | $11.50 Million | $13.62 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2012 | 0.56x | $8.45 Million | $15.15 Million | ▲ +186.1% |
| 2011 | -0.65x | $-6.99 Million | $10.78 Million | ▼ -237.1% |
| 2010 | 0.47x | $4.10 Million | $8.67 Million | ▼ -91.9% |
| 2009 | 5.86x | $25.46 Million | $4.35 Million | ▲ +10733.8% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $1.19 Million | $22.00 Million | ▼ -81.1% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $6.80 Million | $23.76 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2006 | 0.45x | $8.54 Million | $18.83 Million | ▲ +182.7% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $2.48 Million | $15.44 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $3.03 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +1654.2% |
| 2003 | 0.01x | $153.49K | $11.53 Million | ▼ -98.0% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $9.07 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +144.0% |
| 2001 | 0.28x | $4.86 Million | $17.63 Million | ▲ +288.9% |
| 2000 | -0.15x | $-2.40 Million | $16.48 Million | ▼ -129.1% |
| 1999 | 0.50x | $6.80 Million | $13.60 Million | ▲ +167.1% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | $3.80 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $1.70 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -42.6% |
| 1996 | 0.19x | $2.40 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +244.1% |
| 1995 | -0.13x | $-1.80 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | $-1.20 Million | $9.80 Million | ▼ -344.9% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $200.00K | $4.00 Million | ▼ -85.0% |
| 1992 | 0.33x | $1.10 Million | $3.30 Million | — |