Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.22x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($87.90 Million) in capital expenditures ($19.40 Million). See KALU net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. Check Kaiser Aluminum Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation from 1989 to 2025. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see KALU market cap.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.23x | $111.40 Million | $136.90 Million | ▲ +13.6% |
| 2024 | 1.08x | $167.10 Million | $180.80 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2023 | 0.68x | $211.90 Million | $143.20 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2021 | 0.73x | $79.40 Million | $58.00 Million | ▲ +191.2% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $206.90 Million | $51.90 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $232.30 Million | $60.20 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2018 | 0.49x | $150.20 Million | $74.10 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $141.50 Million | $75.50 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $164.30 Million | $76.10 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $158.80 Million | $63.10 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $124.10 Million | $59.40 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | $111.70 Million | $70.40 Million | ▲ +117.8% |
| 2012 | 0.29x | $152.40 Million | $44.10 Million | ▼ -44.1% |
| 2011 | 0.52x | $62.80 Million | $32.50 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2010 | 0.59x | $66.30 Million | $38.90 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2009 | 0.46x | $127.70 Million | $59.20 Million | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2008 | 1.99x | $46.90 Million | $93.20 Million | ▲ +316.7% |
| 2007 | 0.48x | $129.60 Million | $61.80 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2006 | 1.60x | $18.80 Million | $30.00 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2005 | 1.83x | $16.90 Million | $31.00 Million | ▲ +208.1% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $249.80 Million | $148.70 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2000 | 3.10x | $84.60 Million | $261.90 Million | ▲ +581.0% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $170.70 Million | $77.60 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 1997 | 2.86x | $45.00 Million | $128.50 Million | ▼ -61.0% |
| 1996 | 7.32x | $21.90 Million | $160.30 Million | ▲ +994.3% |
| 1995 | 0.67x | $118.70 Million | $79.40 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 1993 | 2.80x | $24.20 Million | $67.70 Million | ▼ -35.7% |
| 1992 | 4.35x | $26.30 Million | $114.40 Million | ▲ +397.2% |
| 1991 | 0.87x | $135.00 Million | $118.10 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 1990 | 0.60x | $192.60 Million | $115.10 Million | ▲ +57.2% |
| 1989 | 0.38x | $306.80 Million | $116.60 Million | — |