Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $87.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.91 Billion) in one year. Check KALU cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Kaiser Aluminum Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Kaiser Aluminum Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $111.40 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $167.10 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $211.90 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +444.6% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-63.10 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -182.9% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $79.40 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $206.90 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | $232.30 Million | $792.30 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $150.20 Million | $678.90 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $141.50 Million | $638.90 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $164.30 Million | $638.80 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $158.80 Million | $475.70 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $124.10 Million | $727.80 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $111.70 Million | $686.70 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $152.40 Million | $681.70 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $62.80 Million | $447.80 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $66.30 Million | $430.20 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2009 | 0.69x | $127.70 Million | $184.30 Million | ▲ +427.9% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $46.90 Million | $357.30 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $129.60 Million | $222.40 Million | ▲ +782.5% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $18.80 Million | $284.70 Million | ▲ +1728.4% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $16.90 Million | $4.68 Billion | ▲ +140.5% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-38.00 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-88.00 Million | $3.24 Billion | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-49.60 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -119.1% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $249.80 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +204.3% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $84.60 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +189.1% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-90.60 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▼ -148.4% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $170.70 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +282.2% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $45.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +103.5% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $21.90 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▼ -82.3% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $118.70 Million | $2.63 Billion | ▲ +380.0% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-41.30 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -259.3% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $24.20 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -45.1% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $26.30 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -80.0% |
| 1991 | 0.09x | $135.00 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $192.60 Million | $1.76 Billion | — |