Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $87.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.91 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Kaiser Aluminum Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Kaiser Aluminum Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kaiser Aluminum Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | $111.40 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $167.10 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -22.7% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $211.90 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +444.6% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-63.10 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -182.9% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $79.40 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $206.90 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | $232.30 Million | $792.30 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $150.20 Million | $678.90 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $141.50 Million | $638.90 Million | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $164.30 Million | $638.80 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $158.80 Million | $475.70 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $124.10 Million | $727.80 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $111.70 Million | $686.70 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $152.40 Million | $681.70 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $62.80 Million | $447.80 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | $66.30 Million | $430.20 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2009 | 0.69x | $127.70 Million | $184.30 Million | ▲ +427.9% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $46.90 Million | $357.30 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $129.60 Million | $222.40 Million | ▲ +782.5% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $18.80 Million | $284.70 Million | ▲ +1728.4% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $16.90 Million | $4.68 Billion | ▲ +140.5% |
| 2004 | -0.01x | $-38.00 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-88.00 Million | $3.24 Billion | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-49.60 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -119.1% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $249.80 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +204.3% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | $84.60 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +189.1% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-90.60 Million | $3.02 Billion | ▼ -148.4% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $170.70 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▲ +282.2% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $45.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +103.5% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $21.90 Million | $2.74 Billion | ▼ -82.3% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $118.70 Million | $2.63 Billion | ▲ +380.0% |
| 1994 | -0.02x | $-41.30 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -259.3% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $24.20 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▼ -45.1% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $26.30 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -80.0% |
| 1991 | 0.09x | $135.00 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -15.9% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $192.60 Million | $1.76 Billion | — |