PAMT CORP (PAMT) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
PAMT CORP (PAMT) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.58x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 1% of its operating cash flow ($5.94 Million) in capital expenditures ($3.42 Million). Check PAMT CORP tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
PAMT CORP Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1992–2025)
This chart tracks PAMT CORP's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PAMT cash generation efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for PAMT CORP (1992–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for PAMT CORP from 1992 to 2025. See PAMT CORP free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.35x | $17.34 Million | $40.74 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2024 | 2.38x | $59.04 Million | $140.76 Million | ▲ +702.0% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $114.58 Million | $34.06 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2022 | 0.38x | $168.81 Million | $63.96 Million | ▲ +101.4% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $101.74 Million | $19.14 Million | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2020 | 0.71x | $67.59 Million | $48.23 Million | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2019 | 0.94x | $84.30 Million | $79.35 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2018 | 0.90x | $82.35 Million | $73.88 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2017 | 1.34x | $50.61 Million | $67.67 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2016 | 1.80x | $47.72 Million | $86.13 Million | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2015 | 2.04x | $61.52 Million | $125.72 Million | ▲ +294.9% |
| 2014 | 0.52x | $55.25 Million | $28.59 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 2013 | 1.66x | $43.17 Million | $71.52 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2012 | 2.92x | $33.62 Million | $98.05 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2011 | 1.99x | $34.90 Million | $69.35 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2010 | 1.60x | $15.00 Million | $24.06 Million | ▲ +320.3% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $32.14 Million | $12.26 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2008 | 1.48x | $40.65 Million | $60.22 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2007 | 1.69x | $45.19 Million | $76.17 Million | ▲ +91.2% |
| 2006 | 0.88x | $60.70 Million | $53.51 Million | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2005 | 2.61x | $23.74 Million | $62.01 Million | ▲ +117.5% |
| 2004 | 1.20x | $44.72 Million | $53.70 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2003 | 1.96x | $37.94 Million | $74.24 Million | ▲ +127.3% |
| 2002 | 0.86x | $48.87 Million | $42.07 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2001 | 1.51x | $31.45 Million | $47.52 Million | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2000 | 0.95x | $32.46 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1999 | 1.30x | $39.55 Million | $51.48 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 1998 | 1.96x | $23.52 Million | $46.12 Million | ▲ +192.9% |
| 1997 | 0.67x | $25.00 Million | $16.74 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 1996 | 1.52x | $13.10 Million | $19.90 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 1995 | 1.66x | $15.28 Million | $25.31 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 1994 | 1.17x | $12.89 Million | $15.11 Million | ▲ +1354.0% |
| 1993 | 0.08x | $6.20 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -51.6% |
| 1992 | 0.17x | $2.40 Million | $400.00K | — |