CTO Realty Growth Inc (CTO) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
CTO Realty Growth Inc (CTO) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 2.64x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 3% of its operating cash flow ($19.97 Million) in capital expenditures ($52.75 Million). Check CTO Realty Growth Inc tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
CTO Realty Growth Inc Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks CTO Realty Growth Inc's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTO operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for CTO Realty Growth Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for CTO Realty Growth Inc from 1989 to 2025. See CTO free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $64.60 Million | $15.16 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $59.87 Million | $17.49 Million | ▼ -86.8% |
| 2023 | 2.22x | $46.42 Million | $102.95 Million | ▼ -60.4% |
| 2022 | 5.60x | $56.10 Million | $313.93 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2021 | 4.69x | $27.58 Million | $129.46 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2020 | 9.91x | $16.93 Million | $167.81 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2019 | 9.18x | $16.41 Million | $150.70 Million | ▲ +308.5% |
| 2018 | 2.25x | $48.66 Million | $109.39 Million | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2017 | 1.64x | $57.55 Million | $94.63 Million | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2016 | 2.98x | $14.29 Million | $42.62 Million | ▲ +3032.4% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $25.19 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $11.33 Million | $1.93 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2013 | 0.27x | $10.89 Million | $2.92 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2012 | 0.42x | $3.50 Million | $1.48 Million | ▼ -90.8% |
| 2008 | 4.59x | $4.10 Million | $18.86 Million | ▲ +1295.5% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $17.05 Million | $5.61 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2006 | 1.96x | $8.62 Million | $16.93 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2005 | 1.10x | $30.80 Million | $34.00 Million | ▲ +72.9% |
| 2004 | 0.64x | $32.64 Million | $20.83 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 2003 | 0.67x | $23.15 Million | $15.59 Million | ▲ +188.7% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $14.88 Million | $3.47 Million | ▼ -95.8% |
| 2001 | 5.61x | $3.11 Million | $17.45 Million | ▲ +384.4% |
| 2000 | 1.16x | $8.23 Million | $9.53 Million | ▲ +566.8% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $12.10 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -13.2% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $2.00 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $4.80 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $2.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 1993 | 0.83x | $1.80 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 1992 | 0.42x | $3.80 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 1991 | 0.42x | $8.50 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 1989 | 0.81x | $4.80 Million | $3.90 Million | — |