CTO Realty Growth Inc (CTO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CTO Realty Growth Inc (CTO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($742.55 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of CTO Realty Growth Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CTO Realty Growth Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CTO Realty Growth Inc across 40 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTO cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CTO Realty Growth Inc (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CTO Realty Growth Inc. Check earnings quality score of CTO Realty Growth Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $64.60 Million | $696.56 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $59.87 Million | $568.85 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $46.42 Million | $532.14 Million | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $56.10 Million | $481.77 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $27.58 Million | $302.66 Million | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $16.93 Million | $315.03 Million | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2019 | 0.04x | $16.41 Million | $417.87 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $48.66 Million | $344.57 Million | ▼ -30.8% |
| 2017 | 0.20x | $57.55 Million | $281.95 Million | ▲ +271.9% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $14.29 Million | $260.35 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $25.19 Million | $265.63 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $11.33 Million | $147.52 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $10.89 Million | $106.01 Million | ▲ +106.6% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $3.50 Million | $70.48 Million | ▲ +229.3% |
| 2011 | -0.04x | $-2.20 Million | $57.10 Million | ▼ -487.4% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-393.80K | $60.16 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-228.02K | $58.54 Million | ▼ -105.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $4.10 Million | $55.33 Million | ▼ -76.0% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $17.05 Million | $55.16 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $8.62 Million | $50.78 Million | ▼ -73.4% |
| 2005 | 0.64x | $30.80 Million | $48.29 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $32.64 Million | $39.61 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2003 | 0.72x | $23.15 Million | $32.25 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2002 | 0.69x | $14.88 Million | $21.47 Million | ▲ +274.9% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $3.11 Million | $16.83 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2000 | 0.49x | $8.23 Million | $16.80 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 1999 | 0.76x | $11.70 Million | $15.40 Million | ▲ +1270.0% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-1.00 Million | $15.40 Million | ▼ -110.8% |
| 1997 | 0.60x | $12.10 Million | $20.10 Million | ▲ +619.4% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $2.00 Million | $23.90 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $4.80 Million | $27.00 Million | ▲ +100.2% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $2.70 Million | $30.40 Million | ▲ +94.9% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $1.80 Million | $39.50 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $3.80 Million | $38.10 Million | ▼ -49.5% |
| 1991 | 0.20x | $8.50 Million | $43.00 Million | ▲ +10280.2% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $51.50 Million | ▼ -101.7% |
| 1989 | 0.12x | $4.80 Million | $40.90 Million | ▲ +128.6% |
| 1988 | 0.05x | $2.10 Million | $40.90 Million | ▼ -71.5% |
| 1986 | 0.18x | $2.20 Million | $12.20 Million | ▼ -58.4% |
| 1985 | 0.43x | $3.60 Million | $8.30 Million | — |