New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.00x as of December 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($6.54 Million) in capital expenditures ($3.00). Check tangible net worth ratio of New England Realty Associates LP to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
New England Realty Associates LP Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks New England Realty Associates LP's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see New England Realty Associates LP operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for New England Realty Associates LP (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for New England Realty Associates LP from 1989 to 2025. See NEN cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $27.66 Billion | $140.92 Million | ▲ +4649616.9% |
| 2024 | 0.00x | $36.50 Million | $4.00 | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $28.36 Million | $4.00 | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $21.54 Million | $5.98 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $15.78 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $17.45 Million | $3.24 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2019 | 1.46x | $22.45 Million | $32.69 Million | ▲ +806.3% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $25.63 Million | $4.12 Million | ▼ -94.9% |
| 2017 | 3.15x | $16.14 Million | $50.78 Million | ▲ +835.1% |
| 2016 | 0.34x | $15.34 Million | $5.16 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2015 | 0.93x | $13.81 Million | $12.90 Million | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2014 | 0.47x | $11.84 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2013 | 2.02x | $13.44 Million | $27.10 Million | ▲ +921.1% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | $11.95 Million | $2.36 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2011 | 1.39x | $9.09 Million | $12.66 Million | ▲ +410.5% |
| 2010 | 0.27x | $8.31 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $9.57 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -85.7% |
| 2008 | 2.30x | $4.41 Million | $10.13 Million | ▲ +211.8% |
| 2007 | 0.74x | $8.64 Million | $6.36 Million | ▲ +126.1% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $8.59 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2005 | 0.32x | $8.07 Million | $2.61 Million | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2004 | 1.03x | $7.86 Million | $8.10 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2003 | 1.72x | $7.67 Million | $13.24 Million | ▲ +231.7% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $11.33 Million | $5.89 Million | ▲ +99.1% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $10.73 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2000 | 0.53x | $10.04 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -55.2% |
| 1999 | 1.19x | $9.27 Million | $11.03 Million | ▲ +179.4% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | $5.46 Million | $2.32 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $5.03 Million | $2.16 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 1996 | 0.77x | $4.17 Million | $3.22 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $2.40 Million | $1.60 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 1993 | 0.71x | $2.80 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 1992 | 0.36x | $2.20 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +9.1% |
| 1991 | 0.33x | $2.70 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -38.5% |
| 1990 | 0.54x | $2.40 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 1989 | 1.17x | $2.30 Million | $2.70 Million | — |