New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($576.93 Billion) in one year. Explore New England Realty Associates LP long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
New England Realty Associates LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for New England Realty Associates LP across 37 annual periods. Also explore New England Realty Associates LP asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for New England Realty Associates LP (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New England Realty Associates LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see New England Realty Associates LP stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47.72x | $27.66 Billion | $579.55 Million | ▲ +59510.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $36.50 Million | $455.94 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $28.36 Million | $451.09 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $21.54 Million | $451.69 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $15.78 Million | $406.17 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $17.45 Million | $333.14 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $22.45 Million | $332.12 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $25.63 Million | $282.66 Million | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $16.14 Million | $262.12 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $15.34 Million | $224.79 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $13.81 Million | $232.98 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $11.84 Million | $205.14 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $13.44 Million | $207.19 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $11.95 Million | $144.05 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $9.09 Million | $146.69 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $8.31 Million | $148.20 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $9.57 Million | $150.42 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $4.41 Million | $142.96 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $8.64 Million | $121.73 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $8.59 Million | $118.84 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $8.07 Million | $119.97 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $7.86 Million | $120.51 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $7.67 Million | $120.90 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $11.33 Million | $87.81 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $10.73 Million | $83.95 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $10.04 Million | $84.41 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $9.27 Million | $82.03 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $5.46 Million | $54.13 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $5.03 Million | $54.68 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $4.17 Million | $54.89 Million | ▲ +1714.5% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $-260.68K | $55.43 Million | ▼ -103.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $2.80 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $2.20 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.70 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 1990 | 0.12x | $2.40 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1989 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $19.60 Million | — |