New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($576.93 Billion) in one year. See NEN FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
New England Realty Associates LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for New England Realty Associates LP across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NEN cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for New England Realty Associates LP (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New England Realty Associates LP. Check earnings quality score of New England Realty Associates LP to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47.72x | $27.66 Billion | $579.55 Million | ▲ +59510.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $36.50 Million | $455.94 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $28.36 Million | $451.09 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $21.54 Million | $451.69 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $15.78 Million | $406.17 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $17.45 Million | $333.14 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $22.45 Million | $332.12 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $25.63 Million | $282.66 Million | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $16.14 Million | $262.12 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $15.34 Million | $224.79 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $13.81 Million | $232.98 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $11.84 Million | $205.14 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $13.44 Million | $207.19 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $11.95 Million | $144.05 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $9.09 Million | $146.69 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $8.31 Million | $148.20 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $9.57 Million | $150.42 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $4.41 Million | $142.96 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $8.64 Million | $121.73 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $8.59 Million | $118.84 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $8.07 Million | $119.97 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $7.86 Million | $120.51 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $7.67 Million | $120.90 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $11.33 Million | $87.81 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $10.73 Million | $83.95 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $10.04 Million | $84.41 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $9.27 Million | $82.03 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $5.46 Million | $54.13 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $5.03 Million | $54.68 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $4.17 Million | $54.89 Million | ▲ +1714.5% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $-260.68K | $55.43 Million | ▼ -103.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $2.80 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $2.20 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.70 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 1990 | 0.12x | $2.40 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1989 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $19.60 Million | — |