New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New England Realty Associates LP (NEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.31 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($576.93 Billion) in one year. See NEN free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
New England Realty Associates LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for New England Realty Associates LP across 37 annual periods. Also explore NEN shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for New England Realty Associates LP (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New England Realty Associates LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see New England Realty Associates LP market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47.72x | $27.66 Billion | $579.55 Million | ▲ +59510.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $36.50 Million | $455.94 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $28.36 Million | $451.09 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $21.54 Million | $451.69 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $15.78 Million | $406.17 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $17.45 Million | $333.14 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $22.45 Million | $332.12 Million | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $25.63 Million | $282.66 Million | ▲ +47.3% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $16.14 Million | $262.12 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $15.34 Million | $224.79 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $13.81 Million | $232.98 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $11.84 Million | $205.14 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $13.44 Million | $207.19 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $11.95 Million | $144.05 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $9.09 Million | $146.69 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $8.31 Million | $148.20 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $9.57 Million | $150.42 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $4.41 Million | $142.96 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $8.64 Million | $121.73 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $8.59 Million | $118.84 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $8.07 Million | $119.97 Million | ▲ +3.1% |
| 2004 | 0.07x | $7.86 Million | $120.51 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $7.67 Million | $120.90 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | $11.33 Million | $87.81 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $10.73 Million | $83.95 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $10.04 Million | $84.41 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1999 | 0.11x | $9.27 Million | $82.03 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 1998 | 0.10x | $5.46 Million | $54.13 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $5.03 Million | $54.68 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $4.17 Million | $54.89 Million | ▲ +1714.5% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $-260.68K | $55.43 Million | ▼ -103.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $2.80 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $2.20 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.70 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 1990 | 0.12x | $2.40 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 1989 | 0.12x | $2.30 Million | $19.60 Million | — |