Magnetite Mines Ltd (MGT) - Cash Flow Conversion Efficiency
Based on the latest financial reports, Magnetite Mines Ltd (MGT) has a cash flow conversion efficiency ratio of -0.030x as of June 2025. Cash flow conversion efficiency measures how effectively a company's net assets (equity) generate operating cash flow. It is calculated by dividing operating cash flow (AU$-1.11 Million ≈ $-783.95K USD) by net assets (AU$36.99 Million ≈ $26.17 Million USD). A higher ratio indicates that the company is more efficient at using its equity to generate cash flow from its core operations. See Magnetite Mines Ltd net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Magnetite Mines Ltd - Cash Flow Conversion Efficiency Trend (2010–2025)
This chart illustrates how Magnetite Mines Ltd's cash flow conversion efficiency has evolved over time, based on yearly financial data. Check Magnetite Mines Ltd earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Magnetite Mines Ltd Competitors by Cash Flow Conversion Efficiency
The table below lists competitors of Magnetite Mines Ltd ranked by their cash flow conversion efficiency.
| Company | Cash Flow Conversion Efficiency |
|---|---|
|
Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.
V:GNG
|
-0.262x |
|
Himalaya Energi Perkasa Tbk PT
JK:HADE
|
-0.012x |
|
Invion Ltd
AU:IVX
|
-0.163x |
|
Vast Renewables Limited Ordinary Shares
NASDAQ:VSTE
|
0.148x |
|
Silver Castle Holdings Ltd
TA:SLCL
|
0.557x |
|
Identitii Ltd
AU:ID8
|
-0.536x |
|
Plaza Centers NV
WAR:PLZ
|
0.001x |
|
Orexplore Technologies Ltd
AU:OXT
|
-0.404x |
Annual Cash Flow Conversion Efficiency for Magnetite Mines Ltd (2010–2025)
The table below shows the annual cash flow conversion efficiency of Magnetite Mines Ltd from 2010 to 2025. For the full company profile with market capitalisation and key ratios, see Magnetite Mines Ltd (MGT) market capitalisation.
| Year | Net Assets | Operating Cash Flow | Cash Flow Conversion Efficiency | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-30 | AU$36.99 Million ≈ $26.17 Million |
AU$-2.81 Million ≈ $-1.99 Million |
-0.076x | +23.67% |
| 2024-06-30 | AU$36.84 Million ≈ $26.07 Million |
AU$-3.67 Million ≈ $-2.59 Million |
-0.099x | +9.30% |
| 2023-06-30 | AU$35.31 Million ≈ $24.98 Million |
AU$-3.87 Million ≈ $-2.74 Million |
-0.110x | -88.13% |
| 2022-06-30 | AU$39.35 Million ≈ $27.84 Million |
AU$-2.29 Million ≈ $-1.62 Million |
-0.058x | -38.24% |
| 2021-06-30 | AU$26.89 Million ≈ $19.03 Million |
AU$-1.13 Million ≈ $-802.64K |
-0.042x | +60.89% |
| 2020-06-30 | AU$8.14 Million ≈ $5.76 Million |
AU$-877.93K ≈ $-621.19K |
-0.108x | +51.60% |
| 2019-06-30 | AU$6.67 Million ≈ $4.72 Million |
AU$-1.49 Million ≈ $-1.05 Million |
-0.223x | +11.61% |
| 2018-06-30 | AU$7.70 Million ≈ $5.45 Million |
AU$-1.94 Million ≈ $-1.37 Million |
-0.252x | -20.28% |
| 2017-06-30 | AU$7.97 Million ≈ $5.64 Million |
AU$-1.67 Million ≈ $-1.18 Million |
-0.210x | -24.90% |
| 2016-06-30 | AU$6.95 Million ≈ $4.92 Million |
AU$-1.17 Million ≈ $-825.44K |
-0.168x | +20.60% |
| 2015-06-30 | AU$6.87 Million ≈ $4.86 Million |
AU$-1.45 Million ≈ $-1.03 Million |
-0.211x | -643.07% |
| 2014-06-30 | AU$34.94 Million ≈ $24.72 Million |
AU$1.36 Million ≈ $962.20K |
0.039x | +302.05% |
| 2013-06-30 | AU$34.19 Million ≈ $24.19 Million |
AU$-658.65K ≈ $-466.04K |
-0.019x | +71.73% |
| 2012-06-30 | AU$35.93 Million ≈ $25.42 Million |
AU$-2.45 Million ≈ $-1.73 Million |
-0.068x | -4.51% |
| 2011-06-30 | AU$24.07 Million ≈ $17.03 Million |
AU$-1.57 Million ≈ $-1.11 Million |
-0.065x | -620.52% |
| 2010-06-30 | AU$23.57 Million ≈ $16.68 Million |
AU$-213.30K ≈ $-150.92K |
-0.009x | -- |
About Magnetite Mines Ltd
Magnetite Mines Limited engages in the exploration of mineral properties in South Australia. The company's flagship project is the Razorback Iron Ore project that includes the Razorback and Iron Peak deposits located in Adelaide, South Australia. The company was formerly known as Royal Resources Limited and changed its name to Magnetite Mines Limited in December 2015. Magnetite Mines Limited was … Read more