AstroNova Inc Cash Flow Quality Index
AstroNova Inc cash flow quality index. AstroNova Inc (ALOT) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 4.63x as of April 2026. Operating cash flow of $3.02 Million exceeds net income of $653.00K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See AstroNova Inc financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of AstroNova Inc (1992–2024)
Cash flow quality index of AstroNova Inc from 1992 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for AstroNova Inc across 31 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore AstroNova Inc cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
AstroNova Inc Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1992–2024)
AstroNova Inc cash flow quality index by year from 1992 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for AstroNova Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ALOT cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.63x | $12.35 Million | $4.69 Million | ▲ +338.5% |
| 2023 | -1.10x | $-2.94 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -608.9% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $1.39 Million | $6.43 Million | ▼ -98.2% |
| 2021 | 12.11x | $15.54 Million | $1.28 Million | ▲ +560.5% |
| 2020 | 1.83x | $3.22 Million | $1.76 Million | ▲ +210.7% |
| 2019 | 0.59x | $3.38 Million | $5.73 Million | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2018 | 1.13x | $3.72 Million | $3.29 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2017 | 1.64x | $6.95 Million | $4.23 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2016 | 1.71x | $7.73 Million | $4.53 Million | ▲ +433.9% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $1.49 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +128.8% |
| 2014 | -1.11x | $-3.57 Million | $3.21 Million | ▼ -409.5% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $3.86 Million | $10.77 Million | ▼ -79.5% |
| 2012 | 1.75x | $5.47 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +224.7% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $1.11 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -74.6% |
| 2010 | 2.11x | $5.85 Million | $2.77 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2009 | 2.35x | $6.95 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2008 | 1.37x | $5.91 Million | $4.31 Million | ▲ +1117.4% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-816.83K | $6.06 Million | ▼ -114.3% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $2.41 Million | $2.55 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2005 | 1.24x | $3.37 Million | $2.71 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2004 | 1.38x | $4.45 Million | $3.22 Million | ▲ +116.1% |
| 2001 | -8.57x | $-2.59 Million | $302.49K | ▼ -271.0% |
| 2000 | 5.01x | $4.69 Million | $936.64K | ▼ -21.7% |
| 1999 | 6.40x | $3.20 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +137.0% |
| 1998 | 2.70x | $2.70 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1997 | 2.09x | $4.80 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 1996 | 1.77x | $2.30 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +660.3% |
| 1995 | -0.32x | $-600.00K | $1.90 Million | ▼ -127.1% |
| 1994 | 1.17x | $3.50 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +133.3% |
| 1993 | 0.50x | $1.80 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 1992 | 1.17x | $12.40 Million | $10.60 Million | — |