AstroNova Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AstroNova Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. AstroNova Inc (ALOT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($62.23 Million) in one year. Check ALOT cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of AstroNova Inc (1992–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of AstroNova Inc from 1992 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for AstroNova Inc across 35 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of AstroNova Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
AstroNova Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2026)
AstroNova Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AstroNova Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does AstroNova Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.19x | $11.74 Million | $60.70 Million | ▲ +178.6% |
| 2025 | 0.07x | $4.85 Million | $69.84 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $12.35 Million | $42.97 Million | ▲ +637.0% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-2.94 Million | $54.84 Million | ▼ -230.4% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $1.39 Million | $33.94 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $15.54 Million | $40.79 Million | ▲ +435.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $3.22 Million | $45.29 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $3.38 Million | $49.21 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $3.72 Million | $58.66 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $6.95 Million | $13.13 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2016 | 0.73x | $7.73 Million | $10.59 Million | ▲ +429.4% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.49 Million | $10.82 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-3.57 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -223.7% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $3.86 Million | $16.20 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.48x | $5.47 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +363.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $1.11 Million | $10.71 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2010 | 0.54x | $5.85 Million | $10.86 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | $6.95 Million | $10.68 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $5.91 Million | $12.34 Million | ▲ +806.0% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | $-816.83K | $12.04 Million | ▼ -126.3% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $2.41 Million | $9.35 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $3.37 Million | $8.63 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $4.45 Million | $7.52 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | $2.68 Million | $6.13 Million | ▲ +138.4% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $1.28 Million | $6.98 Million | ▲ +162.1% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-2.59 Million | $8.77 Million | ▼ -176.6% |
| 2000 | 0.39x | $4.69 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 1999 | 0.40x | $3.20 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $2.70 Million | $7.00 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 1997 | 0.74x | $4.80 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 1996 | 0.37x | $2.30 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +519.8% |
| 1995 | -0.09x | $-600.00K | $6.90 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 1994 | 0.57x | $3.50 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $1.80 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -82.4% |
| 1992 | 1.82x | $12.40 Million | $6.80 Million | — |