AstroNova Inc (ALOT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AstroNova Inc (ALOT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($63.95 Million) in one year. See ALOT free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AstroNova Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AstroNova Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore ALOT shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AstroNova Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AstroNova Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AstroNova Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $4.85 Million | $69.84 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $12.35 Million | $42.97 Million | ▲ +630.2% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | $-2.94 Million | $54.14 Million | ▼ -232.0% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $1.39 Million | $33.94 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $15.54 Million | $40.79 Million | ▲ +435.3% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $3.22 Million | $45.29 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $3.38 Million | $49.21 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $3.72 Million | $58.66 Million | ▼ -88.0% |
| 2017 | 0.53x | $6.95 Million | $13.13 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2016 | 0.73x | $7.73 Million | $10.59 Million | ▲ +429.4% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $1.49 Million | $10.82 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-3.57 Million | $12.09 Million | ▼ -223.7% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $3.86 Million | $16.20 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.48x | $5.47 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +363.4% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $1.11 Million | $10.71 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2010 | 0.54x | $5.85 Million | $10.86 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | $6.95 Million | $10.68 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $5.91 Million | $12.34 Million | ▲ +806.0% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | $-816.83K | $12.04 Million | ▼ -126.3% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $2.41 Million | $9.35 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | $3.37 Million | $8.63 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $4.45 Million | $7.52 Million | ▲ +35.2% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | $2.68 Million | $6.13 Million | ▲ +138.4% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $1.28 Million | $6.98 Million | ▲ +162.1% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-2.59 Million | $8.77 Million | ▼ -176.6% |
| 2000 | 0.39x | $4.69 Million | $12.16 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 1999 | 0.40x | $3.20 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1998 | 0.39x | $2.70 Million | $7.00 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 1997 | 0.74x | $4.80 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 1996 | 0.37x | $2.30 Million | $6.30 Million | ▲ +519.8% |
| 1995 | -0.09x | $-600.00K | $6.90 Million | ▼ -115.2% |
| 1994 | 0.57x | $3.50 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +78.5% |
| 1993 | 0.32x | $1.80 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -82.4% |
| 1992 | 1.82x | $12.40 Million | $6.80 Million | — |