American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
American Woodmark Corporation cash flow quality index. American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.27x as of July 2025. Operating cash flow of $33.08 Million exceeds net income of $14.60 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See financial flexibility index of American Woodmark Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of American Woodmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow quality index of American Woodmark Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for American Woodmark Corporation across 28 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore how well can American Woodmark Corporation service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1990–2025)
American Woodmark Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for American Woodmark Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AMWD operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.09x | $108.45 Million | $99.46 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2024 | 1.99x | $230.75 Million | $116.22 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2023 | 2.10x | $196.73 Million | $93.72 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2021 | 2.58x | $151.76 Million | $58.76 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2020 | 2.37x | $177.54 Million | $74.86 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2019 | 2.28x | $190.84 Million | $83.69 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2018 | 1.37x | $86.78 Million | $63.14 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2017 | 1.08x | $77.08 Million | $71.20 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2016 | 1.22x | $71.78 Million | $58.72 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2015 | 1.65x | $58.74 Million | $35.50 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2014 | 1.98x | $40.53 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2013 | 2.51x | $24.53 Million | $9.76 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2008 | 11.15x | $47.64 Million | $4.27 Million | ▲ +299.1% |
| 2007 | 2.79x | $91.01 Million | $32.56 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2006 | 2.01x | $66.63 Million | $33.21 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2005 | 1.85x | $65.67 Million | $35.59 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2004 | 1.80x | $57.04 Million | $31.71 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2003 | 1.20x | $39.18 Million | $32.70 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2002 | 1.66x | $53.45 Million | $32.16 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2001 | 1.23x | $21.49 Million | $17.42 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2000 | 1.47x | $21.25 Million | $14.47 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 1999 | 0.71x | $12.47 Million | $17.51 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 1998 | 1.25x | $16.34 Million | $13.03 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 1997 | 1.65x | $17.40 Million | $10.55 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 1996 | 3.08x | $11.70 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 1995 | 2.02x | $10.90 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 1994 | 4.82x | $10.60 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -69.6% |
| 1990 | 15.83x | $9.50 Million | $600.00K | — |