American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) — Cash Flow Quality Index
American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.27x as of July 2025. Operating cash flow of $33.08 Million exceeds net income of $14.60 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how efficiently does American Woodmark Corporation generate cash to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for American Woodmark Corporation across 28 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check American Woodmark Corporation cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for American Woodmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for American Woodmark Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see AMWD market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.09x | $108.45 Million | $99.46 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2024 | 1.99x | $230.75 Million | $116.22 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2023 | 2.10x | $196.73 Million | $93.72 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2021 | 2.58x | $151.76 Million | $58.76 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2020 | 2.37x | $177.54 Million | $74.86 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2019 | 2.28x | $190.84 Million | $83.69 Million | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2018 | 1.37x | $86.78 Million | $63.14 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2017 | 1.08x | $77.08 Million | $71.20 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2016 | 1.22x | $71.78 Million | $58.72 Million | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2015 | 1.65x | $58.74 Million | $35.50 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2014 | 1.98x | $40.53 Million | $20.46 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2013 | 2.51x | $24.53 Million | $9.76 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2008 | 11.15x | $47.64 Million | $4.27 Million | ▲ +299.1% |
| 2007 | 2.79x | $91.01 Million | $32.56 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2006 | 2.01x | $66.63 Million | $33.21 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2005 | 1.85x | $65.67 Million | $35.59 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2004 | 1.80x | $57.04 Million | $31.71 Million | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2003 | 1.20x | $39.18 Million | $32.70 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2002 | 1.66x | $53.45 Million | $32.16 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2001 | 1.23x | $21.49 Million | $17.42 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2000 | 1.47x | $21.25 Million | $14.47 Million | ▲ +106.2% |
| 1999 | 0.71x | $12.47 Million | $17.51 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 1998 | 1.25x | $16.34 Million | $13.03 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 1997 | 1.65x | $17.40 Million | $10.55 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 1996 | 3.08x | $11.70 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 1995 | 2.02x | $10.90 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -58.1% |
| 1994 | 4.82x | $10.60 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -69.6% |
| 1990 | 15.83x | $9.50 Million | $600.00K | — |