American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-13.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($603.19 Million) in one year. See American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Woodmark Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore AMWD net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Woodmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Woodmark Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of American Woodmark Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $108.45 Million | $654.57 Million | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $230.75 Million | $683.49 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $196.73 Million | $645.01 Million | ▲ +972.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $24.45 Million | $859.61 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $151.76 Million | $898.16 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $177.54 Million | $922.27 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $190.84 Million | $909.58 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $86.78 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2017 | 0.52x | $77.08 Million | $148.82 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2016 | 0.39x | $71.78 Million | $185.93 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $58.74 Million | $169.06 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | $40.53 Million | $139.52 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $24.53 Million | $147.80 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $16.05 Million | $135.10 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $13.20 Million | $114.41 Million | ▲ +856.3% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $1.29 Million | $107.11 Million | ▼ -97.4% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $46.81 Million | $100.06 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $47.64 Million | $100.17 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2007 | 0.74x | $91.01 Million | $122.60 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $66.63 Million | $135.88 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $65.67 Million | $145.98 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $57.04 Million | $113.91 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | $39.18 Million | $102.63 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2002 | 0.60x | $53.45 Million | $89.05 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $21.49 Million | $70.86 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | $21.25 Million | $74.04 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $12.47 Million | $62.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $16.34 Million | $47.34 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $17.40 Million | $40.86 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $11.70 Million | $40.50 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $10.90 Million | $42.60 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | $10.60 Million | $45.90 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $9.50 Million | $54.30 Million | ▲ +819.8% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-1.40 Million | $57.60 Million | ▼ -153.0% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $2.30 Million | $50.20 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $9.50 Million | $52.40 Million | — |