American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-13.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($603.19 Million) in one year. Explore how much of American Woodmark Corporation's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Woodmark Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Woodmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Woodmark Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $108.45 Million | $654.57 Million | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $230.75 Million | $683.49 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $196.73 Million | $645.01 Million | ▲ +972.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $24.45 Million | $859.61 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $151.76 Million | $898.16 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $177.54 Million | $922.27 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $190.84 Million | $909.58 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $86.78 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2017 | 0.52x | $77.08 Million | $148.82 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2016 | 0.39x | $71.78 Million | $185.93 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $58.74 Million | $169.06 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | $40.53 Million | $139.52 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $24.53 Million | $147.80 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $16.05 Million | $135.10 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $13.20 Million | $114.41 Million | ▲ +856.3% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $1.29 Million | $107.11 Million | ▼ -97.4% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $46.81 Million | $100.06 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $47.64 Million | $100.17 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2007 | 0.74x | $91.01 Million | $122.60 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $66.63 Million | $135.88 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $65.67 Million | $145.98 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $57.04 Million | $113.91 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | $39.18 Million | $102.63 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2002 | 0.60x | $53.45 Million | $89.05 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $21.49 Million | $70.86 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | $21.25 Million | $74.04 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $12.47 Million | $62.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $16.34 Million | $47.34 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $17.40 Million | $40.86 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $11.70 Million | $40.50 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $10.90 Million | $42.60 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | $10.60 Million | $45.90 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $9.50 Million | $54.30 Million | ▲ +819.8% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-1.40 Million | $57.60 Million | ▼ -153.0% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $2.30 Million | $50.20 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $9.50 Million | $52.40 Million | — |