American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Woodmark Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-13.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($603.19 Million) in one year. Check American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of American Woodmark Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of American Woodmark Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for American Woodmark Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of American Woodmark Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
American Woodmark Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
American Woodmark Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Woodmark Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $108.45 Million | $654.57 Million | ▼ -50.9% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $230.75 Million | $683.49 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $196.73 Million | $645.01 Million | ▲ +972.5% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $24.45 Million | $859.61 Million | ▼ -83.2% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $151.76 Million | $898.16 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $177.54 Million | $922.27 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | $190.84 Million | $909.58 Million | ▲ +157.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $86.78 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▼ -84.2% |
| 2017 | 0.52x | $77.08 Million | $148.82 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2016 | 0.39x | $71.78 Million | $185.93 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2015 | 0.35x | $58.74 Million | $169.06 Million | ▲ +19.6% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | $40.53 Million | $139.52 Million | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $24.53 Million | $147.80 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $16.05 Million | $135.10 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $13.20 Million | $114.41 Million | ▲ +856.3% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $1.29 Million | $107.11 Million | ▼ -97.4% |
| 2009 | 0.47x | $46.81 Million | $100.06 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $47.64 Million | $100.17 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2007 | 0.74x | $91.01 Million | $122.60 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $66.63 Million | $135.88 Million | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2005 | 0.45x | $65.67 Million | $145.98 Million | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $57.04 Million | $113.91 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2003 | 0.38x | $39.18 Million | $102.63 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2002 | 0.60x | $53.45 Million | $89.05 Million | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $21.49 Million | $70.86 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | $21.25 Million | $74.04 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $12.47 Million | $62.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $16.34 Million | $47.34 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 1997 | 0.43x | $17.40 Million | $40.86 Million | ▲ +47.4% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $11.70 Million | $40.50 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $10.90 Million | $42.60 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 1994 | 0.23x | $10.60 Million | $45.90 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $9.50 Million | $54.30 Million | ▲ +819.8% |
| 1992 | -0.02x | $-1.40 Million | $57.60 Million | ▼ -153.0% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $2.30 Million | $50.20 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 1990 | 0.18x | $9.50 Million | $52.40 Million | — |