Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
Educational Development Corporation cash flow quality index. Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.33x as of November 2025. Operating cash flow of $2.54 Million is below net income of $7.80 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore EDUC operating cash to total liabilities to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Educational Development Corporation (1989–2026)
Cash flow quality index of Educational Development Corporation from 1989 to 2026. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Educational Development Corporation across 34 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See Educational Development Corporation net asset quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1989–2026)
Educational Development Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1989 to 2026. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Educational Development Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EDUC operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.86x | $2.01 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -94.6% |
| 2024 | 16.02x | $8.75 Million | $546.40K | ▲ +729.2% |
| 2022 | -2.55x | $-21.14 Million | $8.31 Million | ▼ -511.0% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $7.82 Million | $12.62 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.75x | $4.24 Million | $5.65 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2019 | 0.59x | $3.95 Million | $6.68 Million | ▼ -66.6% |
| 2018 | 1.77x | $9.23 Million | $5.21 Million | ▲ +422.1% |
| 2017 | -0.55x | $-1.57 Million | $2.86 Million | ▼ -117.5% |
| 2016 | 3.14x | $6.65 Million | $2.12 Million | ▲ +1130.7% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | $-261.60K | $859.20K | ▼ -103.9% |
| 2014 | 7.73x | $2.77 Million | $357.60K | ▲ +871.6% |
| 2013 | 0.80x | $639.00K | $802.90K | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $783.90K | $1.42 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2011 | 2.41x | $2.82 Million | $1.17 Million | ▲ +1018.6% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $412.30K | $1.91 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2009 | 2.10x | $4.01 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +94.1% |
| 2008 | 1.08x | $2.51 Million | $2.32 Million | ▲ +4.9% |
| 2007 | 1.03x | $2.48 Million | $2.41 Million | ▲ +79.0% |
| 2006 | 0.58x | $1.38 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2005 | 1.69x | $4.08 Million | $2.41 Million | ▲ +393.3% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | $-1.37 Million | $2.37 Million | ▼ -205.2% |
| 2003 | 0.55x | $1.12 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2002 | 2.77x | $4.25 Million | $1.53 Million | ▲ +161.8% |
| 2001 | 1.06x | $1.16 Million | $1.09 Million | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2000 | 1.55x | $1.67 Million | $1.08 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 1999 | 1.15x | $1.50 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1998 | 0.71x | $1.20 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 1997 | 2.56x | $4.10 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +189.4% |
| 1996 | -2.87x | $-4.30 Million | $1.50 Million | ▼ -473.3% |
| 1995 | -0.50x | $-600.00K | $1.20 Million | ▼ -160.0% |
| 1994 | 0.83x | $500.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -16.7% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $400.00K | $400.00K | ▼ -25.0% |
| 1992 | 1.33x | $400.00K | $300.00K | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1989 | 1.00x | $100.00K | $100.00K | — |