Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Educational Development Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $564.30K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.48 Million) in one year. Check EDUC cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Educational Development Corporation (1989–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Educational Development Corporation from 1989 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Educational Development Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check EDUC cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2026)
Educational Development Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Educational Development Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Educational Development Corporation generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $2.01 Million | $14.20 Million | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2025 | 0.09x | $3.21 Million | $37.75 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $8.75 Million | $44.65 Million | ▲ +18225.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $58.50K | $54.70 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2022 | -0.33x | $-21.14 Million | $63.17 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $7.82 Million | $48.59 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $4.24 Million | $35.31 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $3.95 Million | $43.34 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $9.23 Million | $41.22 Million | ▲ +828.0% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-1.57 Million | $51.10 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $6.65 Million | $36.47 Million | ▲ +496.3% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-261.60K | $5.68 Million | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2014 | 0.66x | $2.77 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $639.00K | $4.45 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $783.90K | $3.79 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2011 | 0.70x | $2.82 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +564.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $412.30K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | $4.01 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2008 | 0.77x | $2.51 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $2.48 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $1.38 Million | $5.31 Million | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.08 Million | $5.85 Million | ▲ +347.5% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-1.37 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $1.12 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2002 | 1.05x | $4.25 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +195.3% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | $1.16 Million | $3.26 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $1.67 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.50 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $1.20 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 1997 | 0.80x | $4.10 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +279.5% |
| 1996 | -0.45x | $-4.30 Million | $9.60 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 1995 | -0.14x | $-600.00K | $4.40 Million | ▼ -138.2% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $400.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $400.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +518.2% |
| 1991 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $100.00K | $1.60 Million | — |