Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.20 Million) in one year. Explore EDUC long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Educational Development Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Educational Development Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Educational Development Corporation (1989–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Educational Development Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Educational Development Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $2.01 Million | $14.20 Million | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2025 | 0.09x | $3.21 Million | $37.75 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $8.75 Million | $44.65 Million | ▲ +18225.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $58.50K | $54.70 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2022 | -0.33x | $-21.14 Million | $63.17 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $7.82 Million | $48.59 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $4.24 Million | $35.31 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $3.95 Million | $43.34 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $9.23 Million | $41.22 Million | ▲ +828.0% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-1.57 Million | $51.10 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $6.65 Million | $36.47 Million | ▲ +496.3% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-261.60K | $5.68 Million | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2014 | 0.66x | $2.77 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $639.00K | $4.45 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $783.90K | $3.79 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2011 | 0.70x | $2.82 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +564.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $412.30K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | $4.01 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2008 | 0.77x | $2.51 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $2.48 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $1.38 Million | $5.31 Million | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.08 Million | $5.85 Million | ▲ +347.5% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-1.37 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $1.12 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2002 | 1.05x | $4.25 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +195.3% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | $1.16 Million | $3.26 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $1.67 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.50 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $1.20 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 1997 | 0.80x | $4.10 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +279.5% |
| 1996 | -0.45x | $-4.30 Million | $9.60 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 1995 | -0.14x | $-600.00K | $4.40 Million | ▼ -138.2% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $400.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $400.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +518.2% |
| 1991 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $100.00K | $1.60 Million | — |