Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $564.30K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.48 Million) in one year. See EDUC free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Educational Development Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Educational Development Corporation (1989–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Educational Development Corporation. Check EDUC cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.14x | $2.01 Million | $14.20 Million | ▲ +66.0% |
| 2025 | 0.09x | $3.21 Million | $37.75 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $8.75 Million | $44.65 Million | ▲ +18225.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $58.50K | $54.70 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2022 | -0.33x | $-21.14 Million | $63.17 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $7.82 Million | $48.59 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $4.24 Million | $35.31 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $3.95 Million | $43.34 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $9.23 Million | $41.22 Million | ▲ +828.0% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-1.57 Million | $51.10 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $6.65 Million | $36.47 Million | ▲ +496.3% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-261.60K | $5.68 Million | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2014 | 0.66x | $2.77 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $639.00K | $4.45 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $783.90K | $3.79 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2011 | 0.70x | $2.82 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +564.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $412.30K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | $4.01 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2008 | 0.77x | $2.51 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $2.48 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $1.38 Million | $5.31 Million | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.08 Million | $5.85 Million | ▲ +347.5% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-1.37 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $1.12 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2002 | 1.05x | $4.25 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +195.3% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | $1.16 Million | $3.26 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $1.67 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.50 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $1.20 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 1997 | 0.80x | $4.10 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +279.5% |
| 1996 | -0.45x | $-4.30 Million | $9.60 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 1995 | -0.14x | $-600.00K | $4.40 Million | ▼ -138.2% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $400.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $400.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +518.2% |
| 1991 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $100.00K | $1.60 Million | — |