Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.54 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.56 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Educational Development Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Educational Development Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Educational Development Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Educational Development Corporation (EDUC) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Educational Development Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Educational Development Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Educational Development Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $3.21 Million | $37.75 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $8.75 Million | $44.65 Million | ▲ +18225.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $58.50K | $54.70 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2022 | -0.33x | $-21.14 Million | $63.17 Million | ▼ -308.0% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $7.82 Million | $48.59 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $4.24 Million | $35.31 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $3.95 Million | $43.34 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $9.23 Million | $41.22 Million | ▲ +828.0% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | $-1.57 Million | $51.10 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $6.65 Million | $36.47 Million | ▲ +496.3% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-261.60K | $5.68 Million | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2014 | 0.66x | $2.77 Million | $4.18 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $639.00K | $4.45 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $783.90K | $3.79 Million | ▼ -70.3% |
| 2011 | 0.70x | $2.82 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +564.6% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $412.30K | $3.94 Million | ▼ -89.4% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | $4.01 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2008 | 0.77x | $2.51 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | $2.48 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +135.9% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $1.38 Million | $5.31 Million | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $4.08 Million | $5.85 Million | ▲ +347.5% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-1.37 Million | $4.87 Million | ▼ -247.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $1.12 Million | $5.85 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2002 | 1.05x | $4.25 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +195.3% |
| 2001 | 0.35x | $1.16 Million | $3.26 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $1.67 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.50 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +90.2% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $1.20 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 1997 | 0.80x | $4.10 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +279.5% |
| 1996 | -0.45x | $-4.30 Million | $9.60 Million | ▼ -228.5% |
| 1995 | -0.14x | $-600.00K | $4.40 Million | ▼ -138.2% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $400.00K | $1.50 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 1992 | 0.18x | $400.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +518.2% |
| 1991 | -0.04x | $-100.00K | $2.30 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $100.00K | $1.60 Million | — |