National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) — Cash Flow Quality Index
National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.24x as of January 2026. Operating cash flow of $50.92 Million exceeds net income of $41.21 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Also explore FIZZ asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
National Beverage Corp Cash Flow Quality Index (1992–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for National Beverage Corp across 37 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check FIZZ goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for National Beverage Corp (1992–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for National Beverage Corp. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see National Beverage Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.11x | $206.70 Million | $186.82 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | $197.91 Million | $176.73 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2023 | 1.14x | $161.66 Million | $142.16 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2022 | 0.84x | $133.13 Million | $158.51 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2021 | 1.11x | $193.77 Million | $174.15 Million | ▼ -18.6% |
| 2020 | 1.37x | $177.69 Million | $129.97 Million | ▲ +38.1% |
| 2019 | 0.99x | $139.44 Million | $140.85 Million | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2018 | 1.03x | $154.72 Million | $149.77 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2017 | 1.06x | $113.77 Million | $107.05 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2016 | 1.29x | $78.95 Million | $61.20 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2015 | 1.18x | $58.02 Million | $49.31 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2014 | 1.20x | $52.38 Million | $43.63 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2013 | 0.86x | $40.26 Million | $46.92 Million | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2012 | 0.86x | $37.70 Million | $43.99 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2011 | 1.36x | $55.30 Million | $40.75 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2010 | 1.66x | $54.38 Million | $32.85 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2009 | 1.45x | $35.83 Million | $24.70 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 2009 | 1.45x | $35.83 Million | $24.74 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2008 | 1.51x | $33.99 Million | $22.50 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.51x | $33.99 Million | $22.48 Million | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2007 | 1.33x | $32.84 Million | $24.68 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2006 | 1.28x | $28.55 Million | $22.23 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2005 | 1.95x | $32.90 Million | $16.89 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 2004 | 1.14x | $21.32 Million | $18.70 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.14x | $21.32 Million | $18.69 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2003 | 2.04x | $35.99 Million | $17.60 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2003 | 2.05x | $35.99 Million | $17.59 Million | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2002 | 1.41x | $23.36 Million | $16.55 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2001 | 1.43x | $21.47 Million | $14.98 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2000 | 1.45x | $19.65 Million | $13.58 Million | ▲ +185.0% |
| 1999 | 0.51x | $6.70 Million | $13.20 Million | ▼ -72.3% |
| 1998 | 1.83x | $24.00 Million | $13.10 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1997 | 1.55x | $16.60 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1996 | 1.62x | $14.60 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 1995 | 1.03x | $8.90 Million | $8.60 Million | ▲ +76.8% |
| 1994 | 0.59x | $7.90 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -68.8% |
| 1992 | 1.88x | $10.50 Million | $5.60 Million | — |