National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $50.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($201.41 Million) in one year. Check FIZZ total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
National Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for National Beverage Corp across 38 annual periods. Also explore National Beverage Corp asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for National Beverage Corp (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for National Beverage Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.90x | $206.70 Million | $228.86 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2024 | 0.94x | $197.91 Million | $210.64 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2023 | 0.80x | $161.66 Million | $201.85 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | $133.13 Million | $228.37 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2021 | 0.96x | $193.77 Million | $201.24 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2020 | 0.91x | $177.69 Million | $196.31 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2019 | 1.16x | $139.44 Million | $120.58 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $154.72 Million | $127.39 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $113.77 Million | $112.27 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2016 | 0.79x | $78.95 Million | $99.35 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | 0.58x | $58.02 Million | $99.97 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2014 | 0.45x | $52.38 Million | $116.64 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $40.26 Million | $138.33 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $37.70 Million | $101.35 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $55.30 Million | $102.47 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2010 | 0.55x | $54.38 Million | $98.79 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $35.83 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $35.83 Million | $95.67 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $33.99 Million | $94.50 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $33.99 Million | $94.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $32.84 Million | $100.27 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $28.55 Million | $87.48 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $32.90 Million | $81.29 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $21.32 Million | $74.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $21.32 Million | $74.52 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $35.99 Million | $74.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $35.99 Million | $74.90 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $23.36 Million | $80.01 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $21.47 Million | $95.38 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $19.65 Million | $104.07 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $6.70 Million | $98.40 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $24.00 Million | $112.30 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $16.60 Million | $114.00 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $14.60 Million | $130.50 Million | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $8.90 Million | $118.70 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $7.90 Million | $126.30 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $23.50 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +117.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.50 Million | $135.80 Million | — |