National Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
National Beverage Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $50.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($201.41 Million) in one year. Check FIZZ cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of National Beverage Corp (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of National Beverage Corp from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for National Beverage Corp across 38 annual periods. Check National Beverage Corp total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
National Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
National Beverage Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for National Beverage Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FIZZ cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.90x | $206.70 Million | $228.86 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2024 | 0.94x | $197.91 Million | $210.64 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2023 | 0.80x | $161.66 Million | $201.85 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | $133.13 Million | $228.37 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2021 | 0.96x | $193.77 Million | $201.24 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2020 | 0.91x | $177.69 Million | $196.31 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2019 | 1.16x | $139.44 Million | $120.58 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $154.72 Million | $127.39 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $113.77 Million | $112.27 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2016 | 0.79x | $78.95 Million | $99.35 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | 0.58x | $58.02 Million | $99.97 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2014 | 0.45x | $52.38 Million | $116.64 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $40.26 Million | $138.33 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $37.70 Million | $101.35 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $55.30 Million | $102.47 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2010 | 0.55x | $54.38 Million | $98.79 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $35.83 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $35.83 Million | $95.67 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $33.99 Million | $94.50 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $33.99 Million | $94.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $32.84 Million | $100.27 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $28.55 Million | $87.48 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $32.90 Million | $81.29 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $21.32 Million | $74.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $21.32 Million | $74.52 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $35.99 Million | $74.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $35.99 Million | $74.90 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $23.36 Million | $80.01 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $21.47 Million | $95.38 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $19.65 Million | $104.07 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $6.70 Million | $98.40 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $24.00 Million | $112.30 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $16.60 Million | $114.00 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $14.60 Million | $130.50 Million | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $8.90 Million | $118.70 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $7.90 Million | $126.30 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $23.50 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +117.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.50 Million | $135.80 Million | — |