National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
National Beverage Corp (FIZZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.25x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $50.92 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($201.41 Million) in one year. See FIZZ cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
National Beverage Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for National Beverage Corp across 38 annual periods. Also explore FIZZ year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for National Beverage Corp (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for National Beverage Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see FIZZ company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.90x | $206.70 Million | $228.86 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2024 | 0.94x | $197.91 Million | $210.64 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2023 | 0.80x | $161.66 Million | $201.85 Million | ▲ +37.4% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | $133.13 Million | $228.37 Million | ▼ -39.5% |
| 2021 | 0.96x | $193.77 Million | $201.24 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2020 | 0.91x | $177.69 Million | $196.31 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2019 | 1.16x | $139.44 Million | $120.58 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $154.72 Million | $127.39 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $113.77 Million | $112.27 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2016 | 0.79x | $78.95 Million | $99.35 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | 0.58x | $58.02 Million | $99.97 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2014 | 0.45x | $52.38 Million | $116.64 Million | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $40.26 Million | $138.33 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2012 | 0.37x | $37.70 Million | $101.35 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $55.30 Million | $102.47 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2010 | 0.55x | $54.38 Million | $98.79 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $35.83 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.37x | $35.83 Million | $95.67 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $33.99 Million | $94.50 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $33.99 Million | $94.50 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | $32.84 Million | $100.27 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $28.55 Million | $87.48 Million | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2005 | 0.40x | $32.90 Million | $81.29 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $21.32 Million | $74.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $21.32 Million | $74.52 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $35.99 Million | $74.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $35.99 Million | $74.90 Million | ▲ +64.6% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $23.36 Million | $80.01 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2001 | 0.23x | $21.47 Million | $95.38 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $19.65 Million | $104.07 Million | ▲ +177.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $6.70 Million | $98.40 Million | ▼ -68.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $24.00 Million | $112.30 Million | ▲ +46.8% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $16.60 Million | $114.00 Million | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $14.60 Million | $130.50 Million | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $8.90 Million | $118.70 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $7.90 Million | $126.30 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $23.50 Million | $139.90 Million | ▲ +117.3% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $10.50 Million | $135.80 Million | — |