Northern Technologies Cash Flow Quality Index
Northern Technologies cash flow quality index. Northern Technologies (NTIC) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.68x as of November 2025. Operating cash flow of $341.91K is below net income of $505.88K, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Northern Technologies (NTIC) debt coverage ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Northern Technologies (1991–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Northern Technologies from 1991 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Northern Technologies across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See Northern Technologies (NTIC) balance sheet quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Northern Technologies Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1991–2025)
Northern Technologies cash flow quality index by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Northern Technologies. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NTIC cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.48x | $2.44 Million | $986.39K | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2024 | 0.93x | $5.88 Million | $6.32 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2023 | 1.31x | $5.54 Million | $4.24 Million | ▲ +719.9% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $1.15 Million | $7.19 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2021 | 0.41x | $2.89 Million | $7.00 Million | ▼ -56.1% |
| 2019 | 0.94x | $5.48 Million | $5.82 Million | ▲ +1017.5% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $608.69K | $7.22 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2017 | 1.46x | $5.74 Million | $3.92 Million | ▲ +586.9% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | $-755.54K | $2.52 Million | ▼ -122.4% |
| 2014 | 1.34x | $7.42 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +233.4% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $1.91 Million | $4.75 Million | ▲ +469.8% |
| 2012 | -0.11x | $-388.69K | $3.58 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | $-1.14 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2010 | -0.45x | $-1.18 Million | $2.61 Million | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2008 | -1.11x | $-2.83 Million | $2.55 Million | ▼ -398.5% |
| 2007 | -0.22x | $-717.36K | $3.22 Million | ▼ -144.7% |
| 2006 | 0.50x | $855.47K | $1.72 Million | ▲ +143.6% |
| 2005 | -1.14x | $-1.36 Million | $1.19 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 2004 | -0.53x | $-551.45K | $1.04 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2003 | -2.65x | $-1.35 Million | $507.73K | ▼ -403.9% |
| 2002 | 0.87x | $1.07 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2001 | 0.98x | $1.13 Million | $1.15 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2000 | 1.00x | $2.62 Million | $2.63 Million | ▲ +24.5% |
| 1999 | 0.80x | $2.00 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 1998 | 0.77x | $2.00 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1997 | 0.69x | $1.80 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 1996 | 0.81x | $1.70 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 1995 | 0.83x | $1.50 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1994 | 0.92x | $1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 1993 | 0.92x | $1.10 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 1992 | 0.91x | $1.00 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 1991 | 1.00x | $800.00K | $800.00K | — |