Northern Technologies (NTIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Northern Technologies (NTIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $341.91K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.35 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Northern Technologies to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Northern Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Northern Technologies across 35 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Northern Technologies for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Northern Technologies (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Northern Technologies. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Northern Technologies (NTIC) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $2.44 Million | $26.03 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.88 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $5.54 Million | $18.65 Million | ▲ +391.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $18.95 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $2.89 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2020 | 0.77x | $4.91 Million | $6.37 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2019 | 0.70x | $5.48 Million | $7.84 Million | ▲ +787.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $608.69K | $7.73 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2017 | 1.17x | $5.74 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +127.7% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $2.06 Million | $3.99 Million | ▲ +350.1% |
| 2015 | -0.21x | $-755.54K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -112.4% |
| 2014 | 1.66x | $7.42 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +293.1% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $1.91 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +636.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-388.69K | $4.93 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-1.14 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2010 | -0.35x | $-1.18 Million | $3.33 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | $-1.74 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | $-2.83 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -194.5% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-717.36K | $3.86 Million | ▼ -213.7% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $855.47K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2005 | -0.40x | $-1.36 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-551.45K | $1.97 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2003 | -1.15x | $-1.35 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -191.6% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $1.07 Million | $851.29K | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2001 | 2.09x | $1.13 Million | $542.78K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2000 | 2.59x | $2.62 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 1999 | 2.50x | $2.00 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | 5.00x | $2.00 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +205.6% |
| 1997 | 1.64x | $1.80 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 1996 | 1.70x | $1.70 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 1995 | 2.50x | $1.50 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 1994 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -56.4% |
| 1993 | 5.50x | $1.10 Million | $200.00K | ▲ +65.0% |
| 1992 | 3.33x | $1.00 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +108.3% |
| 1991 | 1.60x | $800.00K | $500.00K | — |