Northern Technologies (NTIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Northern Technologies (NTIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $341.91K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.35 Million) in one year. See NTIC FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Northern Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Northern Technologies across 35 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Northern Technologies to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Northern Technologies (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Northern Technologies. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Northern Technologies worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $2.44 Million | $26.03 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.88 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $5.54 Million | $18.65 Million | ▲ +391.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $18.95 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $2.89 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2020 | 0.77x | $4.91 Million | $6.37 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2019 | 0.70x | $5.48 Million | $7.84 Million | ▲ +787.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $608.69K | $7.73 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2017 | 1.17x | $5.74 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +127.7% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $2.06 Million | $3.99 Million | ▲ +350.1% |
| 2015 | -0.21x | $-755.54K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -112.4% |
| 2014 | 1.66x | $7.42 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +293.1% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $1.91 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +636.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-388.69K | $4.93 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-1.14 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2010 | -0.35x | $-1.18 Million | $3.33 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | $-1.74 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | $-2.83 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -194.5% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-717.36K | $3.86 Million | ▼ -213.7% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $855.47K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2005 | -0.40x | $-1.36 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-551.45K | $1.97 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2003 | -1.15x | $-1.35 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -191.6% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $1.07 Million | $851.29K | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2001 | 2.09x | $1.13 Million | $542.78K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2000 | 2.59x | $2.62 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 1999 | 2.50x | $2.00 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | 5.00x | $2.00 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +205.6% |
| 1997 | 1.64x | $1.80 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 1996 | 1.70x | $1.70 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 1995 | 2.50x | $1.50 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 1994 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -56.4% |
| 1993 | 5.50x | $1.10 Million | $200.00K | ▲ +65.0% |
| 1992 | 3.33x | $1.00 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +108.3% |
| 1991 | 1.60x | $800.00K | $500.00K | — |