Northern Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Northern Technologies cash flow-to-debt ratio. Northern Technologies (NTIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $341.91K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.35 Million) in one year. Check Northern Technologies total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Northern Technologies (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Northern Technologies from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Northern Technologies across 35 annual periods. Check Northern Technologies cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Northern Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Northern Technologies cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Northern Technologies. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NTIC operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $2.44 Million | $26.03 Million | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.88 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2023 | 0.30x | $5.54 Million | $18.65 Million | ▲ +391.4% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $18.95 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $2.89 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -56.5% |
| 2020 | 0.77x | $4.91 Million | $6.37 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2019 | 0.70x | $5.48 Million | $7.84 Million | ▲ +787.0% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $608.69K | $7.73 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2017 | 1.17x | $5.74 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +127.7% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $2.06 Million | $3.99 Million | ▲ +350.1% |
| 2015 | -0.21x | $-755.54K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -112.4% |
| 2014 | 1.66x | $7.42 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +293.1% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $1.91 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +636.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-388.69K | $4.93 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-1.14 Million | $5.41 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2010 | -0.35x | $-1.18 Million | $3.33 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | $-1.74 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2008 | -0.55x | $-2.83 Million | $5.18 Million | ▼ -194.5% |
| 2007 | -0.19x | $-717.36K | $3.86 Million | ▼ -213.7% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $855.47K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +140.9% |
| 2005 | -0.40x | $-1.36 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2004 | -0.28x | $-551.45K | $1.97 Million | ▲ +75.8% |
| 2003 | -1.15x | $-1.35 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -191.6% |
| 2002 | 1.26x | $1.07 Million | $851.29K | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2001 | 2.09x | $1.13 Million | $542.78K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2000 | 2.59x | $2.62 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 1999 | 2.50x | $2.00 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | 5.00x | $2.00 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +205.6% |
| 1997 | 1.64x | $1.80 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 1996 | 1.70x | $1.70 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 1995 | 2.50x | $1.50 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 1994 | 2.40x | $1.20 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -56.4% |
| 1993 | 5.50x | $1.10 Million | $200.00K | ▲ +65.0% |
| 1992 | 3.33x | $1.00 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +108.3% |
| 1991 | 1.60x | $800.00K | $500.00K | — |