Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.36x as of February 2026. Operating cash flow of $896.89K is below net income of $2.50 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Taylor Devices Inc cash debt coverage ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Taylor Devices Inc across 35 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Taylor Devices Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Taylor Devices Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | $7.47 Million | $9.41 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2024 | 1.47x | $13.22 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2023 | 1.23x | $7.71 Million | $6.29 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2022 | 1.48x | $3.31 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 2021 | 6.61x | $7.03 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2020 | 3.25x | $9.83 Million | $3.03 Million | ▲ +210.7% |
| 2019 | 1.04x | $2.66 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $304.47K | $443.37K | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | $-1.06 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -150.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $3.79 Million | $4.21 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2015 | 1.28x | $2.78 Million | $2.17 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2014 | 1.75x | $1.98 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2013 | 2.15x | $5.47 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +524.1% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | $-1.11 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 2011 | 1.69x | $2.40 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2010 | 0.95x | $1.51 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2009 | 1.04x | $594.87K | $571.89K | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2008 | 0.70x | $1.08 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2007 | 3.09x | $1.91 Million | $619.27K | ▲ +273.1% |
| 2006 | -1.78x | $-866.99K | $485.79K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2005 | -4.95x | $-1.00 Million | $202.11K | ▼ -292.6% |
| 2003 | 2.57x | $902.21K | $350.94K | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2002 | -7.84x | $-2.61 Million | $332.78K | ▼ -1507.5% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-508.57K | $1.04 Million | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-76.20K | $865.23K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-100.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -110.2% |
| 1998 | 1.40x | $700.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1997 | 1.60x | $800.00K | $500.00K | ▲ +92.0% |
| 1996 | 0.83x | $500.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -58.3% |
| 1995 | 2.00x | $1.20 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1994 | 2.50x | $500.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +200.0% |
| 1991 | -1.00x | $-100.00K | $100.00K | ▼ -166.7% |
| 1990 | 1.50x | $300.00K | $200.00K | — |