Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow Quality Index
Taylor Devices Inc cash flow quality index. Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -0.06x as of May 2026. Operating cash flow of $-103.33K is below net income of $1.87 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore how well can Taylor Devices Inc service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Taylor Devices Inc (1990–2026)
Cash flow quality index of Taylor Devices Inc from 1990 to 2026. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Taylor Devices Inc across 36 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) net asset quality to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1990–2026)
Taylor Devices Inc cash flow quality index by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Taylor Devices Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TAYD cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.82x | $7.02 Million | $8.56 Million | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2025 | 0.79x | $7.47 Million | $9.41 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2024 | 1.47x | $13.22 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2023 | 1.23x | $7.71 Million | $6.29 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2022 | 1.48x | $3.31 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 2021 | 6.61x | $7.03 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2020 | 3.25x | $9.83 Million | $3.03 Million | ▲ +210.7% |
| 2019 | 1.04x | $2.66 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $304.47K | $443.37K | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | $-1.06 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -150.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $3.79 Million | $4.21 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2015 | 1.28x | $2.78 Million | $2.17 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2014 | 1.75x | $1.98 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2013 | 2.15x | $5.47 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +524.1% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | $-1.11 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 2011 | 1.69x | $2.40 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2010 | 0.95x | $1.51 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2009 | 1.04x | $594.87K | $571.89K | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2008 | 0.70x | $1.08 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2007 | 3.09x | $1.91 Million | $619.27K | ▲ +273.1% |
| 2006 | -1.78x | $-866.99K | $485.79K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2005 | -4.95x | $-1.00 Million | $202.11K | ▼ -292.6% |
| 2003 | 2.57x | $902.21K | $350.94K | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2002 | -7.84x | $-2.61 Million | $332.78K | ▼ -1507.5% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-508.57K | $1.04 Million | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-76.20K | $865.23K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-100.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -110.2% |
| 1998 | 1.40x | $700.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1997 | 1.60x | $800.00K | $500.00K | ▲ +92.0% |
| 1996 | 0.83x | $500.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -58.3% |
| 1995 | 2.00x | $1.20 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1994 | 2.50x | $500.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +200.0% |
| 1991 | -1.00x | $-100.00K | $100.00K | ▼ -166.7% |
| 1990 | 1.50x | $300.00K | $200.00K | — |