Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.36x as of February 2026. Operating cash flow of $896.89K is below net income of $2.50 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Also explore Taylor Devices Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow Quality Index (1990–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Taylor Devices Inc across 35 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Taylor Devices Inc tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Taylor Devices Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Taylor Devices Inc. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see TAYD stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.79x | $7.47 Million | $9.41 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2024 | 1.47x | $13.22 Million | $9.00 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2023 | 1.23x | $7.71 Million | $6.29 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2022 | 1.48x | $3.31 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -77.7% |
| 2021 | 6.61x | $7.03 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2020 | 3.25x | $9.83 Million | $3.03 Million | ▲ +210.7% |
| 2019 | 1.04x | $2.66 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $304.47K | $443.37K | ▲ +251.6% |
| 2017 | -0.45x | $-1.06 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -150.3% |
| 2016 | 0.90x | $3.79 Million | $4.21 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2015 | 1.28x | $2.78 Million | $2.17 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 2014 | 1.75x | $1.98 Million | $1.13 Million | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2013 | 2.15x | $5.47 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +524.1% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | $-1.11 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 2011 | 1.69x | $2.40 Million | $1.42 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2010 | 0.95x | $1.51 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2009 | 1.04x | $594.87K | $571.89K | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2008 | 0.70x | $1.08 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -77.3% |
| 2007 | 3.09x | $1.91 Million | $619.27K | ▲ +273.1% |
| 2006 | -1.78x | $-866.99K | $485.79K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2005 | -4.95x | $-1.00 Million | $202.11K | ▼ -292.6% |
| 2003 | 2.57x | $902.21K | $350.94K | ▲ +132.8% |
| 2002 | -7.84x | $-2.61 Million | $332.78K | ▼ -1507.5% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-508.57K | $1.04 Million | ▼ -453.7% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-76.20K | $865.23K | ▲ +38.4% |
| 1999 | -0.14x | $-100.00K | $700.00K | ▼ -110.2% |
| 1998 | 1.40x | $700.00K | $500.00K | ▼ -12.5% |
| 1997 | 1.60x | $800.00K | $500.00K | ▲ +92.0% |
| 1996 | 0.83x | $500.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -58.3% |
| 1995 | 2.00x | $1.20 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1994 | 2.50x | $500.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +150.0% |
| 1993 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.00x | $200.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +200.0% |
| 1991 | -1.00x | $-100.00K | $100.00K | ▼ -166.7% |
| 1990 | 1.50x | $300.00K | $200.00K | — |