Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $896.89K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.31 Million) in one year. See TAYD FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Taylor Devices Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore TAYD net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Taylor Devices Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taylor Devices Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Taylor Devices Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.78x | $7.47 Million | $9.57 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | $13.22 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.99x | $7.71 Million | $7.79 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $3.31 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2021 | 1.37x | $7.03 Million | $5.13 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2020 | 1.78x | $9.83 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +225.9% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $2.66 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +955.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $304.47K | $5.90 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2017 | -0.25x | $-1.06 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $3.79 Million | $7.33 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $2.78 Million | $8.21 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | $1.98 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2013 | 1.38x | $5.47 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +1028.1% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-1.11 Million | $7.47 Million | ▼ -121.8% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $2.40 Million | $3.49 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $1.51 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +190.2% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $594.87K | $4.25 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $1.08 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $1.91 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +381.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-866.99K | $7.06 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.19x | $-1.00 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2004 | 0.78x | $3.21 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +812.1% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $902.21K | $10.62 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2002 | -0.21x | $-2.61 Million | $12.29 Million | ▼ -212.3% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-508.57K | $7.48 Million | ▼ -287.3% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-76.20K | $4.34 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $4.50 Million | ▼ -115.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $700.00K | $5.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $800.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | $500.00K | $4.10 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $1.20 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $500.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +130.0% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $200.00K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $200.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +260.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -135.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $300.00K | $2.10 Million | — |