Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taylor Devices Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-103.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.16 Million) in one year. Check TAYD total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Taylor Devices Inc (1990–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Taylor Devices Inc from 1990 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Taylor Devices Inc across 37 annual periods. Check how high is Taylor Devices Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Taylor Devices Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taylor Devices Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Taylor Devices Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.44x | $7.02 Million | $4.89 Million | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2025 | 0.78x | $7.47 Million | $9.57 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | $13.22 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.99x | $7.71 Million | $7.79 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $3.31 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2021 | 1.37x | $7.03 Million | $5.13 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2020 | 1.78x | $9.83 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +225.9% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $2.66 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +955.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $304.47K | $5.90 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2017 | -0.25x | $-1.06 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $3.79 Million | $7.33 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $2.78 Million | $8.21 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | $1.98 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2013 | 1.38x | $5.47 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +1028.1% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-1.11 Million | $7.47 Million | ▼ -121.8% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $2.40 Million | $3.49 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $1.51 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +190.2% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $594.87K | $4.25 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $1.08 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $1.91 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +381.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-866.99K | $7.06 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.19x | $-1.00 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2004 | 0.78x | $3.21 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +812.1% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $902.21K | $10.62 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2002 | -0.21x | $-2.61 Million | $12.29 Million | ▼ -212.3% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-508.57K | $7.48 Million | ▼ -287.3% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-76.20K | $4.34 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $4.50 Million | ▼ -115.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $700.00K | $5.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $800.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | $500.00K | $4.10 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $1.20 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $500.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +130.0% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $200.00K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $200.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +260.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -135.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $300.00K | $2.10 Million | — |