Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Taylor Devices Inc (TAYD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $896.89K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.31 Million) in one year. Check TAYD cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Taylor Devices Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Taylor Devices Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Taylor Devices Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Taylor Devices Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Taylor Devices Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TAYD stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.78x | $7.47 Million | $9.57 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2024 | 1.12x | $13.22 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2023 | 0.99x | $7.71 Million | $7.79 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $3.31 Million | $5.96 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2021 | 1.37x | $7.03 Million | $5.13 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2020 | 1.78x | $9.83 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +225.9% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $2.66 Million | $4.88 Million | ▲ +955.5% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $304.47K | $5.90 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2017 | -0.25x | $-1.06 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -147.5% |
| 2016 | 0.52x | $3.79 Million | $7.33 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2015 | 0.34x | $2.78 Million | $8.21 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2014 | 0.46x | $1.98 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2013 | 1.38x | $5.47 Million | $3.95 Million | ▲ +1028.1% |
| 2012 | -0.15x | $-1.11 Million | $7.47 Million | ▼ -121.8% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $2.40 Million | $3.49 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2010 | 0.41x | $1.51 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +190.2% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | $594.87K | $4.25 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | $1.08 Million | $3.87 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2007 | 0.35x | $1.91 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +381.2% |
| 2006 | -0.12x | $-866.99K | $7.06 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.19x | $-1.00 Million | $5.23 Million | ▼ -124.7% |
| 2004 | 0.78x | $3.21 Million | $4.14 Million | ▲ +812.1% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $902.21K | $10.62 Million | ▲ +140.0% |
| 2002 | -0.21x | $-2.61 Million | $12.29 Million | ▼ -212.3% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-508.57K | $7.48 Million | ▼ -287.3% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-76.20K | $4.34 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-100.00K | $4.50 Million | ▼ -115.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $700.00K | $5.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $800.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 1996 | 0.12x | $500.00K | $4.10 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 1995 | 0.29x | $1.20 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $500.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +130.0% |
| 1993 | 0.09x | $200.00K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +8.7% |
| 1992 | 0.08x | $200.00K | $2.50 Million | ▲ +260.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.00 Million | ▼ -135.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $300.00K | $2.10 Million | — |