Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.60x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $40.40 Million is below net income of $66.95 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. Explore Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1996–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | $80.06 Million | $182.49 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2024 | 2.96x | $612.65 Million | $207.19 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.88x | $375.80 Million | $200.00 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2022 | 4.54x | $809.27 Million | $178.14 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2021 | 3.30x | $436.41 Million | $132.26 Million | ▲ +479.2% |
| 2020 | -0.87x | $-94.55 Million | $108.65 Million | ▼ -383.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-19.70 Million | $109.55 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2018 | 1.85x | $200.03 Million | $108.08 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 2.08x | $175.01 Million | $84.32 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2016 | 2.70x | $208.59 Million | $77.30 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2015 | 2.50x | $184.35 Million | $73.84 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2014 | 2.21x | $155.05 Million | $70.28 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2013 | 3.22x | $313.99 Million | $97.52 Million | ▲ +566.7% |
| 2012 | 0.48x | $33.30 Million | $68.96 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $26.82 Million | $38.85 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2010 | -9.19x | $-484.20 Million | $52.70 Million | ▼ -3041.5% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | $31.11 Million | $99.60 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2007 | 16.17x | $107.68 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +345.8% |
| 2006 | 3.63x | $116.08 Million | $32.01 Million | ▲ +1634.2% |
| 2005 | -0.24x | $-6.97 Million | $29.51 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 2004 | 2.88x | $87.61 Million | $30.47 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2003 | 2.52x | $68.61 Million | $27.27 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2002 | 1.89x | $43.08 Million | $22.75 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2001 | 8.15x | $132.72 Million | $16.28 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2000 | 12.87x | $134.28 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1999 | 12.36x | $85.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1998 | 12.63x | $72.00 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $16.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1996 | 11.50x | $4.60 Million | $400.00K | — |