Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation cash flow quality index. Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 0.60x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $40.40 Million is below net income of $66.95 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See AGM financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore AGM operating cash flow to total debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1996–2025)
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation cash flow quality index by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AGM cash flow metrics.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | $80.06 Million | $182.49 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2024 | 2.96x | $612.65 Million | $207.19 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.88x | $375.80 Million | $200.00 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2022 | 4.54x | $809.27 Million | $178.14 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2021 | 3.30x | $436.41 Million | $132.26 Million | ▲ +479.2% |
| 2020 | -0.87x | $-94.55 Million | $108.65 Million | ▼ -383.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-19.70 Million | $109.55 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2018 | 1.85x | $200.03 Million | $108.08 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 2.08x | $175.01 Million | $84.32 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2016 | 2.70x | $208.59 Million | $77.30 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2015 | 2.50x | $184.35 Million | $73.84 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2014 | 2.21x | $155.05 Million | $70.28 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2013 | 3.22x | $313.99 Million | $97.52 Million | ▲ +566.7% |
| 2012 | 0.48x | $33.30 Million | $68.96 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $26.82 Million | $38.85 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2010 | -9.19x | $-484.20 Million | $52.70 Million | ▼ -3041.5% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | $31.11 Million | $99.60 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2007 | 16.17x | $107.68 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +345.8% |
| 2006 | 3.63x | $116.08 Million | $32.01 Million | ▲ +1634.2% |
| 2005 | -0.24x | $-6.97 Million | $29.51 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 2004 | 2.88x | $87.61 Million | $30.47 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2003 | 2.52x | $68.61 Million | $27.27 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2002 | 1.89x | $43.08 Million | $22.75 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2001 | 8.15x | $132.72 Million | $16.28 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2000 | 12.87x | $134.28 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1999 | 12.36x | $85.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1998 | 12.63x | $72.00 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $16.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1996 | 11.50x | $4.60 Million | $400.00K | — |