Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.56x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $92.05 Million exceeds net income of $59.12 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio (AGM) cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1996–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio (AGM) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | $80.06 Million | $182.49 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2024 | 2.96x | $612.65 Million | $207.19 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.88x | $375.80 Million | $200.00 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2022 | 4.54x | $809.27 Million | $178.14 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2021 | 3.30x | $436.41 Million | $132.26 Million | ▲ +479.2% |
| 2020 | -0.87x | $-94.55 Million | $108.65 Million | ▼ -383.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-19.70 Million | $109.55 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2018 | 1.85x | $200.03 Million | $108.08 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 2.08x | $175.01 Million | $84.32 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2016 | 2.70x | $208.59 Million | $77.30 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2015 | 2.50x | $184.35 Million | $73.84 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2014 | 2.21x | $155.05 Million | $70.28 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2013 | 3.22x | $313.99 Million | $97.52 Million | ▲ +566.7% |
| 2012 | 0.48x | $33.30 Million | $68.96 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $26.82 Million | $38.85 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2010 | -9.19x | $-484.20 Million | $52.70 Million | ▼ -3041.5% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | $31.11 Million | $99.60 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2007 | 16.17x | $107.68 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +345.8% |
| 2006 | 3.63x | $116.08 Million | $32.01 Million | ▲ +1634.2% |
| 2005 | -0.24x | $-6.97 Million | $29.51 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 2004 | 2.88x | $87.61 Million | $30.47 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2003 | 2.52x | $68.61 Million | $27.27 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2002 | 1.89x | $43.08 Million | $22.75 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2001 | 8.15x | $132.72 Million | $16.28 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2000 | 12.87x | $134.28 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1999 | 12.36x | $85.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1998 | 12.63x | $72.00 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $16.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1996 | 11.50x | $4.60 Million | $400.00K | — |