Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.56x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of $92.05 Million exceeds net income of $59.12 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio (AGM) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1996–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 29 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check how tangible is Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio's equity to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see market value of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | $80.06 Million | $182.49 Million | ▼ -85.2% |
| 2024 | 2.96x | $612.65 Million | $207.19 Million | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.88x | $375.80 Million | $200.00 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2022 | 4.54x | $809.27 Million | $178.14 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2021 | 3.30x | $436.41 Million | $132.26 Million | ▲ +479.2% |
| 2020 | -0.87x | $-94.55 Million | $108.65 Million | ▼ -383.9% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-19.70 Million | $109.55 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2018 | 1.85x | $200.03 Million | $108.08 Million | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 2.08x | $175.01 Million | $84.32 Million | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2016 | 2.70x | $208.59 Million | $77.30 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2015 | 2.50x | $184.35 Million | $73.84 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2014 | 2.21x | $155.05 Million | $70.28 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2013 | 3.22x | $313.99 Million | $97.52 Million | ▲ +566.7% |
| 2012 | 0.48x | $33.30 Million | $68.96 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.69x | $26.82 Million | $38.85 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 2010 | -9.19x | $-484.20 Million | $52.70 Million | ▼ -3041.5% |
| 2009 | 0.31x | $31.11 Million | $99.60 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2007 | 16.17x | $107.68 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +345.8% |
| 2006 | 3.63x | $116.08 Million | $32.01 Million | ▲ +1634.2% |
| 2005 | -0.24x | $-6.97 Million | $29.51 Million | ▼ -108.2% |
| 2004 | 2.88x | $87.61 Million | $30.47 Million | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2003 | 2.52x | $68.61 Million | $27.27 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2002 | 1.89x | $43.08 Million | $22.75 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2001 | 8.15x | $132.72 Million | $16.28 Million | ▼ -36.6% |
| 2000 | 12.87x | $134.28 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1999 | 12.36x | $85.30 Million | $6.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1998 | 12.63x | $72.00 Million | $5.70 Million | ▲ +245.9% |
| 1997 | 3.65x | $16.80 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -68.2% |
| 1996 | 11.50x | $4.60 Million | $400.00K | — |