Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $40.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($37.44 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio (AGM) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. Check AGM cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $80.06 Million | $33.79 Billion | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $612.65 Million | $29.84 Billion | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $375.80 Million | $28.11 Billion | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $809.27 Million | $26.06 Billion | ▲ +70.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $436.41 Million | $23.91 Billion | ▲ +551.1% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-94.55 Million | $23.36 Billion | ▼ -329.6% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-19.70 Million | $20.91 Billion | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $200.03 Million | $17.94 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $175.01 Million | $17.08 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $208.59 Million | $14.96 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $184.35 Million | $14.99 Billion | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $155.05 Million | $13.51 Billion | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $313.99 Million | $12.79 Billion | ▲ +786.9% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $33.30 Million | $12.03 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $26.82 Million | $9.00 Billion | ▲ +105.5% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-484.20 Million | $9.00 Billion | ▼ -1106.1% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $31.11 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▲ +239.2% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $-19.02 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -117.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $107.68 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $116.08 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▲ +1547.8% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-6.97 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $87.61 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $68.61 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $43.08 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $132.72 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $134.28 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $85.30 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $72.00 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +194.2% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $16.80 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +59.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $4.60 Million | $555.60 Million | ▼ -54.9% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $9.20 Million | $500.80 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $7.40 Million | $465.00 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $12.20 Million | $511.70 Million | ▲ +484.6% |
| 1992 | -0.01x | $-3.10 Million | $500.10 Million | — |