Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $92.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($35.01 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation across 34 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporatio market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $80.06 Million | $33.79 Billion | ▼ -88.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $612.65 Million | $29.84 Billion | ▲ +53.6% |
| 2023 | 0.01x | $375.80 Million | $28.11 Billion | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $809.27 Million | $26.06 Billion | ▲ +70.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $436.41 Million | $23.91 Billion | ▲ +551.1% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-94.55 Million | $23.36 Billion | ▼ -329.6% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-19.70 Million | $20.91 Billion | ▼ -108.4% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $200.03 Million | $17.94 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $175.01 Million | $17.08 Billion | ▼ -26.5% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | $208.59 Million | $14.96 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $184.35 Million | $14.99 Billion | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2014 | 0.01x | $155.05 Million | $13.51 Billion | ▼ -53.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $313.99 Million | $12.79 Billion | ▲ +786.9% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $33.30 Million | $12.03 Billion | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $26.82 Million | $9.00 Billion | ▲ +105.5% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-484.20 Million | $9.00 Billion | ▼ -1106.1% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $31.11 Million | $5.82 Billion | ▲ +239.2% |
| 2008 | 0.00x | $-19.02 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -117.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $107.68 Million | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $116.08 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▲ +1547.8% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-6.97 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $87.61 Million | $3.61 Billion | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $68.61 Million | $4.09 Billion | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $43.08 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -73.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $132.72 Million | $3.28 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $134.28 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +30.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $85.30 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $72.00 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +194.2% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $16.80 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▲ +59.4% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $4.60 Million | $555.60 Million | ▼ -54.9% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $9.20 Million | $500.80 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $7.40 Million | $465.00 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $12.20 Million | $511.70 Million | ▲ +484.6% |
| 1992 | -0.01x | $-3.10 Million | $500.10 Million | — |