Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.09x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of $93.56 Million exceeds net income of $44.74 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore HAE cash flow metrics to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Haemonetics Corporation Cash Flow Quality Index (1992–2026)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Haemonetics Corporation across 32 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check HAE cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Haemonetics Corporation (1992–2026)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Haemonetics Corporation. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see Haemonetics Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.01x | $293.22 Million | $97.31 Million | ▲ +178.0% |
| 2025 | 1.08x | $181.72 Million | $167.68 Million | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2024 | 1.55x | $181.75 Million | $117.56 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2023 | 2.37x | $273.06 Million | $115.40 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2022 | 3.97x | $172.26 Million | $43.38 Million | ▲ +190.1% |
| 2021 | 1.37x | $108.81 Million | $79.47 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2020 | 2.07x | $158.22 Million | $76.53 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2019 | 2.90x | $159.28 Million | $55.02 Million | ▼ -40.1% |
| 2018 | 4.84x | $220.35 Million | $45.57 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2015 | 7.53x | $127.18 Million | $16.90 Million | ▲ +89.6% |
| 2014 | 3.97x | $139.52 Million | $35.15 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2013 | 2.19x | $85.07 Million | $38.80 Million | ▼ -98.5% |
| 2012 | 149.38x | $115.32 Million | $772.00K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2011 | 183.17x | $123.45 Million | $674.00K | ▲ +8082.2% |
| 2010 | 2.24x | $130.67 Million | $58.37 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2009 | 1.96x | $116.36 Million | $59.30 Million | ▲ +31.3% |
| 2008 | 1.49x | $77.67 Million | $51.98 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2007 | 1.70x | $83.56 Million | $49.11 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2006 | 1.24x | $85.62 Million | $69.08 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2005 | 1.80x | $71.21 Million | $39.64 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2004 | 2.54x | $74.61 Million | $29.32 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2003 | 1.54x | $43.67 Million | $28.38 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2002 | 1.07x | $32.24 Million | $30.03 Million | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2001 | 8.43x | $61.01 Million | $7.24 Million | ▲ +199.6% |
| 2000 | 2.81x | $53.47 Million | $19.00 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 1999 | 1.60x | $33.70 Million | $21.10 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1997 | 0.81x | $26.70 Million | $33.00 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 1996 | 1.53x | $54.80 Million | $35.90 Million | ▲ +228.8% |
| 1995 | 0.46x | $15.60 Million | $33.60 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1994 | 0.86x | $27.00 Million | $31.50 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 1993 | 1.45x | $35.90 Million | $24.80 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1992 | 1.04x | $18.80 Million | $18.00 Million | — |