Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Haemonetics Corporation (HAE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $70.94 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.60 Billion) in one year. Check HAE cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Haemonetics Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Haemonetics Corporation across 35 annual periods. Also explore Haemonetics Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Haemonetics Corporation (1992–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Haemonetics Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HAE market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.20x | $293.22 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2025 | 0.11x | $181.72 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $181.75 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $273.06 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $172.26 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $108.81 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $158.22 Million | $680.00 Million | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $159.28 Million | $606.90 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $220.35 Million | $484.91 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2017 | 0.32x | $159.74 Million | $499.10 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $121.86 Million | $597.13 Million | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.19x | $127.18 Million | $657.00 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $139.52 Million | $681.23 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $85.07 Million | $692.69 Million | ▼ -81.3% |
| 2012 | 0.66x | $115.32 Million | $175.56 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2011 | 0.84x | $123.45 Million | $147.13 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2010 | 0.81x | $130.67 Million | $161.02 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2009 | 1.06x | $116.36 Million | $109.81 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2008 | 0.68x | $77.67 Million | $114.76 Million | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2007 | 0.90x | $83.56 Million | $93.09 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2006 | 0.82x | $85.62 Million | $104.89 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2005 | 0.63x | $71.21 Million | $112.62 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $74.61 Million | $127.64 Million | ▲ +82.0% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $43.67 Million | $135.97 Million | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2002 | 0.25x | $32.24 Million | $128.10 Million | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $61.01 Million | $129.80 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2000 | 0.37x | $53.47 Million | $142.67 Million | ▲ +49.6% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $33.70 Million | $134.50 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $20.40 Million | $142.00 Million | ▼ -47.2% |
| 1997 | 0.27x | $26.70 Million | $98.20 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 1996 | 0.77x | $54.80 Million | $70.80 Million | ▲ +333.1% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $15.60 Million | $87.30 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 1994 | 0.39x | $27.00 Million | $69.90 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 1993 | 0.67x | $35.90 Million | $53.60 Million | ▲ +93.1% |
| 1992 | 0.35x | $18.80 Million | $54.20 Million | — |