Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow Quality Index
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited cash flow quality index. Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.34x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$2.08 Billion exceeds net income of CA$1.56 Billion, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See financial flexibility index of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (1993–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited from 1993 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited across 24 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore cash flow to debt ratio of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1993–2025)
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited cash flow quality index by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Agnico Eagle Mines Limited generate cash.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.55x | CA$6.93 Billion | CA$4.46 Billion | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2024 | 2.09x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2023 | 1.36x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$1.94 Billion | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2022 | 3.13x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$670.25 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2021 | 2.42x | CA$1.32 Billion | CA$543.01 Million | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2020 | 2.33x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$511.61 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 2019 | 1.86x | CA$881.69 Million | CA$473.17 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2017 | 3.15x | CA$767.56 Million | CA$243.89 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2016 | 4.90x | CA$778.62 Million | CA$158.82 Million | ▼ -80.4% |
| 2015 | 25.07x | CA$616.24 Million | CA$24.58 Million | ▲ +211.2% |
| 2014 | 8.06x | CA$668.32 Million | CA$82.97 Million | ▲ +259.8% |
| 2012 | 2.24x | CA$696.01 Million | CA$310.92 Million | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2010 | 1.46x | CA$483.47 Million | CA$332.12 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2009 | 1.33x | CA$115.11 Million | CA$86.54 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2008 | 1.61x | CA$118.08 Million | CA$73.17 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2007 | 1.64x | CA$229.19 Million | CA$139.34 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2006 | 1.40x | CA$226.25 Million | CA$161.34 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2005 | 2.24x | CA$82.98 Million | CA$36.99 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2004 | 1.03x | CA$49.52 Million | CA$47.88 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2002 | 3.26x | CA$13.11 Million | CA$4.02 Million | ▼ -92.3% |
| 1996 | 42.32x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$219.00K | ▲ +1876.6% |
| 1995 | 2.14x | CA$32.34 Million | CA$15.10 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 1994 | 2.31x | CA$22.89 Million | CA$9.91 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1993 | 2.51x | CA$14.05 Million | CA$5.59 Million | — |