Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.08 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$9.18 Billion) in one year. See AEM financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AEM cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. Check AEM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.71x | CA$6.93 Billion | CA$9.71 Billion | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$9.15 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$9.26 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$7.25 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.32 Billion | CA$4.21 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$881.69 Million | CA$3.68 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$605.65 Million | CA$3.30 Billion | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | CA$767.56 Million | CA$2.92 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | CA$778.62 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | CA$616.24 Million | CA$2.54 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | CA$668.32 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$438.30 Million | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$696.01 Million | CA$1.85 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.37x | CA$663.46 Million | CA$1.81 Billion | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | CA$483.47 Million | CA$1.84 Billion | ▲ +242.0% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$115.11 Million | CA$1.50 Billion | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$118.08 Million | CA$861.07 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | CA$229.19 Million | CA$676.56 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2006 | 0.84x | CA$226.25 Million | CA$269.08 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$82.98 Million | CA$321.00 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$49.52 Million | CA$247.94 Million | ▲ +1010.2% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$4.25 Million | CA$236.38 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$13.11 Million | CA$196.11 Million | ▲ +394.7% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-4.18 Million | CA$184.20 Million | ▼ -488.3% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$228.30 Million | ▲ +131.2% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CA$-2.90 Million | CA$155.10 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$3.29 Million | CA$131.46 Million | ▲ +237.2% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$133.96 Million | ▼ -129.3% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$148.49 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | CA$32.34 Million | CA$155.37 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | CA$22.89 Million | CA$146.23 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 1993 | 0.48x | CA$14.05 Million | CA$29.15 Million | — |