Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.35 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.88 Billion) in one year. Explore Agnico Eagle Mines Limited long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited across 33 annual periods. Also explore AEM total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AEM market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.71x | CA$6.93 Billion | CA$9.71 Billion | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$9.15 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$9.26 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$7.25 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.32 Billion | CA$4.21 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$881.69 Million | CA$3.68 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$605.65 Million | CA$3.30 Billion | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | CA$767.56 Million | CA$2.92 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | CA$778.62 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | CA$616.24 Million | CA$2.54 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | CA$668.32 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$438.30 Million | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$696.01 Million | CA$1.85 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.37x | CA$663.46 Million | CA$1.81 Billion | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | CA$483.47 Million | CA$1.84 Billion | ▲ +242.0% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$115.11 Million | CA$1.50 Billion | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$118.08 Million | CA$861.07 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | CA$229.19 Million | CA$676.56 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2006 | 0.84x | CA$226.25 Million | CA$269.08 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$82.98 Million | CA$321.00 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$49.52 Million | CA$247.94 Million | ▲ +1010.2% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$4.25 Million | CA$236.38 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$13.11 Million | CA$196.11 Million | ▲ +394.7% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-4.18 Million | CA$184.20 Million | ▼ -488.3% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$228.30 Million | ▲ +131.2% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CA$-2.90 Million | CA$155.10 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$3.29 Million | CA$131.46 Million | ▲ +237.2% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$133.96 Million | ▼ -129.3% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$148.49 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | CA$32.34 Million | CA$155.37 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | CA$22.89 Million | CA$146.23 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 1993 | 0.48x | CA$14.05 Million | CA$29.15 Million | — |