Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.35 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$8.88 Billion) in one year. See Agnico Eagle Mines Limited free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited across 33 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.71x | CA$6.93 Billion | CA$9.71 Billion | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$9.15 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$9.26 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$7.25 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.32 Billion | CA$4.21 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$881.69 Million | CA$3.68 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$605.65 Million | CA$3.30 Billion | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | CA$767.56 Million | CA$2.92 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | CA$778.62 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | CA$616.24 Million | CA$2.54 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | CA$668.32 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$438.30 Million | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$696.01 Million | CA$1.85 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.37x | CA$663.46 Million | CA$1.81 Billion | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | CA$483.47 Million | CA$1.84 Billion | ▲ +242.0% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$115.11 Million | CA$1.50 Billion | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$118.08 Million | CA$861.07 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | CA$229.19 Million | CA$676.56 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2006 | 0.84x | CA$226.25 Million | CA$269.08 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$82.98 Million | CA$321.00 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$49.52 Million | CA$247.94 Million | ▲ +1010.2% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$4.25 Million | CA$236.38 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$13.11 Million | CA$196.11 Million | ▲ +394.7% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-4.18 Million | CA$184.20 Million | ▼ -488.3% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$228.30 Million | ▲ +131.2% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CA$-2.90 Million | CA$155.10 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$3.29 Million | CA$131.46 Million | ▲ +237.2% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$133.96 Million | ▼ -129.3% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$148.49 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | CA$32.34 Million | CA$155.37 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | CA$22.89 Million | CA$146.23 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 1993 | 0.48x | CA$14.05 Million | CA$29.15 Million | — |