Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.08 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$9.18 Billion) in one year. Check how high is Agnico Eagle Mines Limited's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited across 33 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Agnico Eagle Mines Limited to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.71x | CA$6.93 Billion | CA$9.71 Billion | ▲ +64.9% |
| 2024 | 0.43x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$9.15 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | CA$2.65 Billion | CA$9.26 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | CA$2.10 Billion | CA$7.25 Billion | ▼ -7.6% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | CA$1.32 Billion | CA$4.21 Billion | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | CA$1.19 Billion | CA$3.93 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | CA$881.69 Million | CA$3.68 Billion | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | CA$605.65 Million | CA$3.30 Billion | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | CA$767.56 Million | CA$2.92 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | CA$778.62 Million | CA$2.62 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | CA$616.24 Million | CA$2.54 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | CA$668.32 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +9.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | CA$438.30 Million | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$696.01 Million | CA$1.85 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.37x | CA$663.46 Million | CA$1.81 Billion | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2010 | 0.26x | CA$483.47 Million | CA$1.84 Billion | ▲ +242.0% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$115.11 Million | CA$1.50 Billion | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | CA$118.08 Million | CA$861.07 Million | ▼ -59.5% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | CA$229.19 Million | CA$676.56 Million | ▼ -59.7% |
| 2006 | 0.84x | CA$226.25 Million | CA$269.08 Million | ▲ +225.3% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | CA$82.98 Million | CA$321.00 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$49.52 Million | CA$247.94 Million | ▲ +1010.2% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$4.25 Million | CA$236.38 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | CA$13.11 Million | CA$196.11 Million | ▲ +394.7% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | CA$-4.18 Million | CA$184.20 Million | ▼ -488.3% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$228.30 Million | ▲ +131.2% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | CA$-2.90 Million | CA$155.10 Million | ▼ -174.7% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | CA$3.29 Million | CA$131.46 Million | ▲ +237.2% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$133.96 Million | ▼ -129.3% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | CA$9.27 Million | CA$148.49 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1995 | 0.21x | CA$32.34 Million | CA$155.37 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | CA$22.89 Million | CA$146.23 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 1993 | 0.48x | CA$14.05 Million | CA$29.15 Million | — |