Mattr Corp Cash Flow Quality Index
Mattr Corp cash flow quality index. Mattr Corp (MATR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 103.52x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$80.22 Million exceeds net income of CA$775.00K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See Mattr Corp (MATR) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Mattr Corp (1992–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Mattr Corp from 1992 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Mattr Corp across 27 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore Mattr Corp (MATR) debt coverage ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Mattr Corp Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1992–2025)
Mattr Corp cash flow quality index by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Mattr Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MATR cash generation efficiency.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.16x | CA$104.43 Million | CA$48.29 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2023 | 2.23x | CA$124.61 Million | CA$55.83 Million | ▲ +91.3% |
| 2018 | 1.17x | CA$30.55 Million | CA$26.18 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2017 | 2.51x | CA$178.45 Million | CA$71.18 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2015 | 2.82x | CA$281.04 Million | CA$99.52 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2014 | 2.00x | CA$187.99 Million | CA$94.19 Million | ▲ +1276.8% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | CA$32.26 Million | CA$222.59 Million | ▼ -95.1% |
| 2012 | 2.97x | CA$530.09 Million | CA$178.46 Million | ▲ +271.4% |
| 2011 | 0.80x | CA$45.33 Million | CA$56.68 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | CA$53.24 Million | CA$105.39 Million | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2009 | 2.28x | CA$299.33 Million | CA$131.11 Million | ▲ +124.6% |
| 2008 | 1.02x | CA$140.99 Million | CA$138.72 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2007 | 0.80x | CA$94.38 Million | CA$117.82 Million | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2006 | 2.02x | CA$187.45 Million | CA$92.92 Million | ▲ +189.5% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | CA$57.68 Million | CA$82.79 Million | ▼ -88.7% |
| 2003 | 6.19x | CA$150.75 Million | CA$24.35 Million | ▲ +349.6% |
| 2002 | -2.48x | CA$-2.81 Million | CA$1.13 Million | ▼ -372.8% |
| 2001 | 0.91x | CA$30.35 Million | CA$33.38 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2000 | 1.34x | CA$32.00 Million | CA$23.86 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 1999 | 2.72x | CA$83.80 Million | CA$30.80 Million | ▲ +84.9% |
| 1998 | 1.47x | CA$102.40 Million | CA$69.60 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 1997 | 1.28x | CA$75.20 Million | CA$58.70 Million | ▼ -0.2% |
| 1996 | 1.28x | CA$47.00 Million | CA$36.60 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 1995 | 1.79x | CA$36.60 Million | CA$20.40 Million | ▲ +311.4% |
| 1994 | 0.44x | CA$13.30 Million | CA$30.50 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 1993 | 1.76x | CA$24.80 Million | CA$14.10 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 1992 | 1.74x | CA$17.20 Million | CA$9.90 Million | — |