Mullen Group Ltd. Cash Flow Quality Index
Mullen Group Ltd. cash flow quality index. Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 4.08x as of December 2025. Operating cash flow of CA$59.52 Million exceeds net income of CA$14.61 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore MTL operating cash flow to total debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Mullen Group Ltd. (1996–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Mullen Group Ltd. from 1996 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Mullen Group Ltd. across 28 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) net asset quality to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Mullen Group Ltd. Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1996–2025)
Mullen Group Ltd. cash flow quality index by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Mullen Group Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MTL operating cash flow.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.79x | CA$254.01 Million | CA$91.11 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2024 | 2.64x | CA$296.12 Million | CA$112.26 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2023 | 2.02x | CA$276.75 Million | CA$136.72 Million | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2022 | 1.66x | CA$262.97 Million | CA$158.62 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2021 | 2.73x | CA$197.97 Million | CA$72.44 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2020 | 3.51x | CA$224.82 Million | CA$63.98 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2019 | 2.36x | CA$170.65 Million | CA$72.24 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2017 | 2.17x | CA$142.09 Million | CA$65.51 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2016 | 3.35x | CA$174.31 Million | CA$52.04 Million | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2015 | 15.83x | CA$211.57 Million | CA$13.37 Million | ▲ +502.6% |
| 2014 | 2.63x | CA$248.59 Million | CA$94.63 Million | ▲ +75.6% |
| 2013 | 1.50x | CA$214.40 Million | CA$143.29 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2012 | 2.14x | CA$279.85 Million | CA$130.91 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2011 | 1.85x | CA$221.41 Million | CA$119.43 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2010 | 1.19x | CA$94.51 Million | CA$79.10 Million | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2009 | 2.34x | CA$212.20 Million | CA$90.81 Million | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2008 | 1.80x | CA$203.76 Million | CA$113.00 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2006 | 1.50x | CA$192.18 Million | CA$128.13 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2005 | 1.01x | CA$70.67 Million | CA$69.96 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2004 | 1.51x | CA$70.00 Million | CA$46.48 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2003 | 1.61x | CA$53.80 Million | CA$33.51 Million | ▲ +40.2% |
| 2002 | 1.15x | CA$21.36 Million | CA$18.65 Million | ▼ -12.5% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | CA$39.94 Million | CA$30.51 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2000 | 0.81x | CA$24.88 Million | CA$30.77 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 1999 | 1.28x | CA$20.30 Million | CA$15.80 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 1998 | 1.23x | CA$21.70 Million | CA$17.60 Million | ▼ -20.9% |
| 1997 | 1.56x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$18.80 Million | ▼ -17.4% |
| 1996 | 1.89x | CA$21.90 Million | CA$11.60 Million | — |