Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$59.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.43 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of Mullen Group Ltd.'s assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mullen Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mullen Group Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Mullen Group Ltd. for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mullen Group Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mullen Group Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MTL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$254.01 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | CA$296.12 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | CA$276.75 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | CA$262.97 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$197.97 Million | CA$1.03 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | CA$224.82 Million | CA$821.52 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$170.65 Million | CA$831.37 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | CA$140.71 Million | CA$747.78 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | CA$142.09 Million | CA$760.93 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CA$174.31 Million | CA$912.62 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | CA$211.57 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | CA$248.59 Million | CA$961.19 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | CA$214.40 Million | CA$687.50 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$279.85 Million | CA$728.78 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$221.41 Million | CA$822.84 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$94.51 Million | CA$759.29 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | CA$212.20 Million | CA$759.66 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | CA$203.76 Million | CA$775.14 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$212.39 Million | CA$638.36 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | CA$192.18 Million | CA$597.18 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | CA$70.67 Million | CA$180.75 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.53x | CA$70.00 Million | CA$132.73 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | CA$53.80 Million | CA$157.31 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$21.36 Million | CA$99.84 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2001 | 0.73x | CA$39.94 Million | CA$55.02 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | CA$24.88 Million | CA$70.46 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | CA$20.30 Million | CA$43.40 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1998 | 0.64x | CA$21.70 Million | CA$33.80 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 1997 | 0.71x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$41.40 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 1996 | 0.57x | CA$21.90 Million | CA$38.10 Million | — |