Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$59.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.43 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Mullen Group Ltd. generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mullen Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mullen Group Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore MTL net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mullen Group Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mullen Group Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$254.01 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | CA$296.12 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | CA$276.75 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | CA$262.97 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$197.97 Million | CA$1.03 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | CA$224.82 Million | CA$821.52 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$170.65 Million | CA$831.37 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | CA$140.71 Million | CA$747.78 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | CA$142.09 Million | CA$760.93 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CA$174.31 Million | CA$912.62 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | CA$211.57 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | CA$248.59 Million | CA$961.19 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | CA$214.40 Million | CA$687.50 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$279.85 Million | CA$728.78 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$221.41 Million | CA$822.84 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$94.51 Million | CA$759.29 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | CA$212.20 Million | CA$759.66 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | CA$203.76 Million | CA$775.14 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$212.39 Million | CA$638.36 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | CA$192.18 Million | CA$597.18 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | CA$70.67 Million | CA$180.75 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.53x | CA$70.00 Million | CA$132.73 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | CA$53.80 Million | CA$157.31 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$21.36 Million | CA$99.84 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2001 | 0.73x | CA$39.94 Million | CA$55.02 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | CA$24.88 Million | CA$70.46 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | CA$20.30 Million | CA$43.40 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1998 | 0.64x | CA$21.70 Million | CA$33.80 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 1997 | 0.71x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$41.40 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 1996 | 0.57x | CA$21.90 Million | CA$38.10 Million | — |