Mullen Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mullen Group Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$59.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.43 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does Mullen Group Ltd. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mullen Group Ltd. (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mullen Group Ltd. from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mullen Group Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Mullen Group Ltd. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Mullen Group Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Mullen Group Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mullen Group Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mullen Group Ltd. (MTL) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | CA$254.01 Million | CA$1.43 Billion | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | CA$296.12 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2023 | 0.26x | CA$276.75 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | CA$262.97 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$197.97 Million | CA$1.03 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | CA$224.82 Million | CA$821.52 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.21x | CA$170.65 Million | CA$831.37 Million | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | CA$140.71 Million | CA$747.78 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | CA$142.09 Million | CA$760.93 Million | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CA$174.31 Million | CA$912.62 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | CA$211.57 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2014 | 0.26x | CA$248.59 Million | CA$961.19 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | CA$214.40 Million | CA$687.50 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2012 | 0.38x | CA$279.85 Million | CA$728.78 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | CA$221.41 Million | CA$822.84 Million | ▲ +116.2% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | CA$94.51 Million | CA$759.29 Million | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | CA$212.20 Million | CA$759.66 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | CA$203.76 Million | CA$775.14 Million | ▼ -21.0% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$212.39 Million | CA$638.36 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | CA$192.18 Million | CA$597.18 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2005 | 0.39x | CA$70.67 Million | CA$180.75 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2004 | 0.53x | CA$70.00 Million | CA$132.73 Million | ▲ +54.2% |
| 2003 | 0.34x | CA$53.80 Million | CA$157.31 Million | ▲ +59.8% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | CA$21.36 Million | CA$99.84 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2001 | 0.73x | CA$39.94 Million | CA$55.02 Million | ▲ +105.6% |
| 2000 | 0.35x | CA$24.88 Million | CA$70.46 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 1999 | 0.47x | CA$20.30 Million | CA$43.40 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1998 | 0.64x | CA$21.70 Million | CA$33.80 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 1997 | 0.71x | CA$29.30 Million | CA$41.40 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 1996 | 0.57x | CA$21.90 Million | CA$38.10 Million | — |