Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.27x as of March 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$1.02 Billion exceeds net income of CA$809.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore how much of Teck Resources Limited's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Teck Resources Limited Cash Flow Quality Index (1993–2025)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Teck Resources Limited across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check tangible net worth ratio of Teck Resources Limited to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Teck Resources Limited (1993–2025)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Teck Resources Limited. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see TECK-B market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.75x | CA$1.04 Billion | CA$1.40 Billion | ▼ -57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.75x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$2.33 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2022 | 1.96x | CA$7.98 Billion | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2021 | 1.63x | CA$4.74 Billion | CA$2.92 Billion | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2018 | 1.41x | CA$4.44 Billion | CA$3.15 Billion | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2017 | 2.00x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$2.54 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2016 | 2.94x | CA$3.06 Billion | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2014 | 5.96x | CA$2.28 Billion | CA$382.00 Million | ▲ +109.3% |
| 2013 | 2.85x | CA$2.88 Billion | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2012 | 3.21x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$870.00 Million | ▲ +124.7% |
| 2011 | 1.43x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2010 | 1.39x | CA$2.74 Billion | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2009 | 1.70x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$1.75 Billion | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2008 | 3.20x | CA$2.17 Billion | CA$677.51 Million | ▲ +209.3% |
| 2007 | 1.04x | CA$1.72 Billion | CA$1.66 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2006 | 1.21x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$2.40 Billion | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2005 | 1.22x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2004 | 1.88x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$594.00 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2003 | 2.68x | CA$400.00 Million | CA$149.00 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2002 | 8.40x | CA$252.00 Million | CA$30.00 Million | ▲ +181.1% |
| 2000 | 2.99x | CA$254.00 Million | CA$85.00 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1999 | 2.95x | CA$133.40 Million | CA$45.20 Million | ▲ +403.7% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | CA$149.30 Million | CA$254.80 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 1995 | 1.57x | CA$140.50 Million | CA$89.60 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 1994 | 1.99x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$69.10 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1993 | 4.71x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$29.20 Million | — |