Teck Resources Limited Cash Flow Quality Index
Teck Resources Limited cash flow quality index. Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 1.76x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of CA$1.50 Billion exceeds net income of CA$854.00 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore TECK-B operating cash to total liabilities to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Teck Resources Limited (1993–2025)
Cash flow quality index of Teck Resources Limited from 1993 to 2025. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Teck Resources Limited across 26 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. See Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) balance sheet quality index to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Teck Resources Limited Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1993–2025)
Teck Resources Limited cash flow quality index by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Teck Resources Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Teck Resources Limited.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (CAD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.97x | CA$1.04 Billion | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2023 | 1.75x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$2.33 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2022 | 1.96x | CA$7.98 Billion | CA$4.07 Billion | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2021 | 1.63x | CA$4.74 Billion | CA$2.92 Billion | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2018 | 1.41x | CA$4.44 Billion | CA$3.15 Billion | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2017 | 2.00x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$2.54 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2016 | 2.94x | CA$3.06 Billion | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2014 | 5.96x | CA$2.28 Billion | CA$382.00 Million | ▲ +109.3% |
| 2013 | 2.85x | CA$2.88 Billion | CA$1.01 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2012 | 3.21x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$870.00 Million | ▲ +124.7% |
| 2011 | 1.43x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2010 | 1.39x | CA$2.74 Billion | CA$1.98 Billion | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2009 | 1.70x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$1.75 Billion | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2008 | 3.20x | CA$2.17 Billion | CA$677.51 Million | ▲ +209.3% |
| 2007 | 1.04x | CA$1.72 Billion | CA$1.66 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2006 | 1.21x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$2.40 Billion | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2005 | 1.22x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2004 | 1.88x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$594.00 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2003 | 2.68x | CA$400.00 Million | CA$149.00 Million | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2002 | 8.40x | CA$252.00 Million | CA$30.00 Million | ▲ +181.1% |
| 2000 | 2.99x | CA$254.00 Million | CA$85.00 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 1999 | 2.95x | CA$133.40 Million | CA$45.20 Million | ▲ +403.7% |
| 1996 | 0.59x | CA$149.30 Million | CA$254.80 Million | ▼ -62.6% |
| 1995 | 1.57x | CA$140.50 Million | CA$89.60 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 1994 | 1.99x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$69.10 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1993 | 4.71x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$29.20 Million | — |