Teck Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teck Resources Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.50 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$19.46 Billion) in one year. Check Teck Resources Limited total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Teck Resources Limited (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Teck Resources Limited from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Teck Resources Limited across 33 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Teck Resources Limited to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Teck Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Teck Resources Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teck Resources Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Teck Resources Limited cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | CA$1.04 Billion | CA$19.43 Billion | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$19.94 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$27.90 Billion | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | CA$7.98 Billion | CA$25.85 Billion | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | CA$4.74 Billion | CA$23.59 Billion | ▲ +164.3% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$20.57 Billion | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$17.28 Billion | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | CA$4.44 Billion | CA$16.61 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$17.53 Billion | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$3.06 Billion | CA$18.03 Billion | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | CA$1.95 Billion | CA$18.05 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | CA$2.28 Billion | CA$18.00 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | CA$2.88 Billion | CA$17.37 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$16.64 Billion | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$16.33 Billion | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | CA$2.74 Billion | CA$13.03 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$15.29 Billion | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | CA$2.17 Billion | CA$20.53 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | CA$1.72 Billion | CA$5.76 Billion | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2006 | 0.59x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$4.90 Billion | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$4.43 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$2.84 Billion | ▲ +169.9% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$400.00 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | CA$252.00 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$299.00 Million | CA$2.56 Billion | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | CA$254.00 Million | CA$2.40 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$133.40 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +12.8% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | CA$121.40 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -14.9% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | CA$139.80 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | CA$149.30 Million | CA$1.05 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | CA$140.50 Million | CA$725.40 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1994 | 0.18x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$768.00 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 1993 | 0.28x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$492.90 Million | — |