Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Teck Resources Limited (TECK-B) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.02 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$19.43 Billion) in one year. See TECK-B FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Teck Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Teck Resources Limited across 33 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Teck Resources Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Teck Resources Limited (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Teck Resources Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Teck Resources Limited worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | CA$1.04 Billion | CA$19.43 Billion | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$19.94 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | CA$4.08 Billion | CA$27.90 Billion | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | CA$7.98 Billion | CA$25.85 Billion | ▲ +53.8% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | CA$4.74 Billion | CA$23.59 Billion | ▲ +164.3% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | CA$1.56 Billion | CA$20.57 Billion | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | CA$3.48 Billion | CA$17.28 Billion | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | CA$4.44 Billion | CA$16.61 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | CA$5.07 Billion | CA$17.53 Billion | ▲ +70.5% |
| 2016 | 0.17x | CA$3.06 Billion | CA$18.03 Billion | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | CA$1.95 Billion | CA$18.05 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | CA$2.28 Billion | CA$18.00 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | CA$2.88 Billion | CA$17.37 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$2.79 Billion | CA$16.64 Billion | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | CA$3.96 Billion | CA$16.33 Billion | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | CA$2.74 Billion | CA$13.03 Billion | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | CA$2.98 Billion | CA$15.29 Billion | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | CA$2.17 Billion | CA$20.53 Billion | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2007 | 0.30x | CA$1.72 Billion | CA$5.76 Billion | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2006 | 0.59x | CA$2.91 Billion | CA$4.90 Billion | ▲ +59.4% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | CA$1.65 Billion | CA$4.43 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | CA$1.12 Billion | CA$2.84 Billion | ▲ +169.9% |
| 2003 | 0.15x | CA$400.00 Million | CA$2.74 Billion | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | CA$252.00 Million | CA$2.41 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2001 | 0.12x | CA$299.00 Million | CA$2.56 Billion | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | CA$254.00 Million | CA$2.40 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$133.40 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +12.8% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | CA$121.40 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | ▼ -14.9% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | CA$139.80 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | CA$149.30 Million | CA$1.05 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | CA$140.50 Million | CA$725.40 Million | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1994 | 0.18x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$768.00 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 1993 | 0.28x | CA$137.50 Million | CA$492.90 Million | — |