Lepidico Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2024: 0.00x

Lepidico Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lepidico Ltd (LPD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of June 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of AU$-2.67K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (AU$13.55 Million) in one year. Check LPD operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

AU$-2.67K
AUD

Total Liabilities

AU$13.55 Million
AUD

Data as of

Jun 2024
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lepidico Ltd (1996–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lepidico Ltd from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lepidico Ltd across 15 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Lepidico Ltd reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Lepidico Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)

Lepidico Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lepidico Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Lepidico Ltd generate cash.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (AUD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.42x AU$-5.71 Million AU$13.55 Million ▲ +12.7%
2023 -0.48x AU$-6.76 Million AU$13.99 Million ▼ -66.2%
2022 -0.29x AU$-5.48 Million AU$18.86 Million ▼ -391.4%
2021 0.10x AU$1.04 Million AU$10.39 Million ▲ +134.0%
2020 -0.29x AU$-4.68 Million AU$15.94 Million ▲ +90.3%
2019 -3.01x AU$-3.50K AU$1.16K ▲ +15.2%
2018 -3.55x AU$-3.04K AU$855.51 ▼ -127.3%
2017 -1.56x AU$-2.67K AU$1.71K ▼ -30.7%
2016 -1.20x AU$-773.50 AU$646.81 ▲ +70.4%
2015 -4.04x AU$-1.05K AU$259.75 ▼ -166.1%
2014 -1.52x AU$-497.06 AU$327.16 ▼ -159796.9%
2013 0.00x AU$-341.95 AU$359.88K ▲ +100.0%
2011 -5.26x AU$-1.23 Million AU$234.20K ▲ +51.6%
2010 -10.88x AU$-1.99 Million AU$182.71K ▼ -416.8%
1996 -2.10x AU$-358.38K AU$170.25K —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.