Fortum Oyj Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Fortum Oyj cash flow-to-debt ratio. Fortum Oyj (FORTUM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of €53.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€7.83 Billion) in one year. Check FORTUM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Fortum Oyj (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Fortum Oyj from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Fortum Oyj across 28 annual periods. Check Fortum Oyj (FORTUM) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Fortum Oyj Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Fortum Oyj cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Fortum Oyj. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FORTUM cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (EUR) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | €840.00 Million | €7.83 Billion | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | €1.39 Billion | €8.15 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2023 | 0.18x | €1.82 Billion | €10.24 Billion | ▲ +132.2% |
| 2022 | -0.55x | €-8.77 Billion | €15.90 Billion | ▼ -1608.3% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | €4.97 Billion | €136.00 Billion | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | €2.56 Billion | €42.23 Billion | ▼ -69.6% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | €2.02 Billion | €10.13 Billion | ▲ +155.6% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | €804.00 Million | €10.33 Billion | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | €993.00 Million | €8.47 Billion | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | €621.00 Million | €8.42 Billion | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | €1.38 Billion | €8.90 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | €1.76 Billion | €10.44 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | €1.84 Billion | €13.76 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | €1.38 Billion | €13.81 Billion | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | €1.61 Billion | €12.84 Billion | ▲ +15.6% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | €1.44 Billion | €13.22 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | €2.26 Billion | €11.35 Billion | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | €2.00 Billion | €11.87 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | €1.67 Billion | €9.02 Billion | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | €1.15 Billion | €8.68 Billion | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2005 | 0.18x | €1.40 Billion | €7.72 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2004 | 0.19x | €1.75 Billion | €9.05 Billion | ▲ +21.6% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | €1.58 Billion | €9.92 Billion | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | €1.35 Billion | €10.63 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | €1.15 Billion | €7.54 Billion | ▲ +205.4% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | €424.00 Million | €8.53 Billion | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | €494.00 Million | €7.25 Billion | ▼ -42.8% |
| 1998 | 0.12x | €833.00 Million | €6.99 Billion | — |