Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (EGSER) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL-204.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL4.75 Billion) in one year. Check Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS (2005–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS from 2005 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS across 19 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ege Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EGSER cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | TL-304.82 Million | TL4.75 Billion | ▼ -146.3% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | TL360.81 Million | TL2.60 Billion | ▲ +157.6% |
| 2023 | -0.24x | TL-279.55 Million | TL1.16 Billion | ▼ -1201.7% |
| 2022 | -0.02x | TL-14.59 Million | TL789.36 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2021 | 0.52x | TL224.55 Million | TL429.59 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2020 | 0.55x | TL135.48 Million | TL246.54 Million | ▲ +368.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | TL18.44 Million | TL157.28 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 2018 | 0.52x | TL62.40 Million | TL120.34 Million | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | TL35.15 Million | TL136.90 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | TL18.41 Million | TL140.78 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2015 | 0.46x | TL69.43 Million | TL150.32 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2014 | 0.28x | TL29.99 Million | TL105.90 Million | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | TL30.22 Million | TL103.70 Million | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2012 | 0.49x | TL41.46 Million | TL84.51 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | TL21.10 Million | TL60.93 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2010 | 0.72x | TL40.38 Million | TL56.31 Million | ▲ +60.2% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | TL31.02 Million | TL69.29 Million | ▲ +265.8% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | TL16.92 Million | TL138.33 Million | ▼ -63.2% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | TL42.60 Million | TL128.02 Million | — |