Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS (PETUN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS (PETUN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of TL-137.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (TL5.22 Billion) in one year. See PETUN financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2003–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS across 22 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS (2003–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS. Check how high is Pinar Entegre Et ve Un Sanayi AS's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TRY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.16x | TL599.16 Million | TL3.85 Billion | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | TL262.00 Million | TL2.90 Billion | ▲ +193.7% |
| 2022 | -0.10x | TL-114.13 Million | TL1.18 Billion | ▼ -144.6% |
| 2021 | 0.22x | TL115.80 Million | TL536.48 Million | ▲ +39.5% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | TL50.38 Million | TL325.62 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2019 | 0.32x | TL61.61 Million | TL195.00 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | TL39.73 Million | TL179.25 Million | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | TL66.95 Million | TL148.83 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | TL36.40 Million | TL128.03 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2015 | 0.30x | TL34.67 Million | TL115.10 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | TL33.57 Million | TL100.35 Million | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2013 | 0.43x | TL46.25 Million | TL108.25 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | TL32.54 Million | TL96.38 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | TL30.57 Million | TL113.28 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | TL13.54 Million | TL72.55 Million | ▼ -69.1% |
| 2009 | 0.60x | TL43.73 Million | TL72.29 Million | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2008 | 0.45x | TL32.96 Million | TL74.06 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2007 | 0.61x | TL35.28 Million | TL57.38 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | TL23.96 Million | TL57.78 Million | ▲ +81.6% |
| 2005 | 0.23x | TL26.54 Million | TL116.21 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2004 | 0.75x | TL83.31 Million | TL111.51 Million | ▲ +434.8% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | TL19.91 Million | TL142.48 Million | — |